Abstract:A slit-lamp examination is an indispensable and essential clinical evaluation method in ophthalmology, but, it is qualitative subjective. To complement its weaknesses in making a quantitative evaluation of flare intensity and number of cells in the aqueous humor in the eye, we invented the laser flare-cell photometer in 1988. The instrument enables a non-invasive quantitative evaluation of flare intensity and number of cells in the aqueous with good accuracy and repeatability as well as maneuverability equal t… Show more
“…The breakdown of the blood–aqueous barrier (BAB) and the appearance of inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber (A/C) are the hallmarks of uveitis. 1–3 The collapse of BAB results in the release of serum proteins into A/C. The inflammatory cells and proteins scatter light (i.e., Tyndall effect) giving rise to aqueous flare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inflammatory cells and proteins scatter light (i.e., Tyndall effect) giving rise to aqueous flare. 1,3 One conventional approach to scoring the severity of uveitis is based on grading the intensity of aqueous flare using slit-lamp biomicroscopy as per Standard Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) scoring system. 4 According to SUN classification, the aqueous flare is graded 0 in the absence of any notable flare, 1+ for faint flare, 2+ for moderate flare (iris and lens details clear), 3+ for marked flare (iris and lens details are hazy), and 4+ for intense flare (fibrin in the aqueous humor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The scoring system, albeit subjective, is frequently employed in the clinical management of uveitis. 1,3–5 The subjective nature of SUN scoring leads to significant intra- and interobserver variability. Moreover, the grading does not offer sufficient granularity (i.e., subdivisions between 0 to 1+, 1+ to 2+, and 2+ to 3+) that would be essential for evaluation of the efficacy of drugs or modalities of drug delivery toward the treatment of uveitis.…”
PurposeTo evaluate a custom-made ocular fluorometer for detection of intensity of light scatter (ILS) from the anterior chamber (A/C) as an objective measure of aqueous flare.MethodsThe fluorometer, equipped with a lock-in amplifier, was employed in the scatter mode to detect ILS from A/C. Measurements were performed with two illumination slit widths of 0.5 and 0.25 mm. The axial resolution at these slit widths were 80 and 200 μm, respectively. Healthy and pseudophakic eyes, with grade 0 Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) score, were employed as control subjects. ILS was also recorded in a cohort of patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and showed grades 1+ or 2+ on postoperative days 1 and 4.ResultsThe inter- and intraobserver variabilities in the measurement of ILS were not significant. In cataract patients, ILS was significantly higher on postoperative day 1 relative to healthy eyes. By day 4, ILS decreased significantly and was only marginally different from ILS in quiet pseudophakic eyes or healthy eyes. Eyes with higher SUN scores showed proportionately increased ILS. The receiver-operator characteristic analysis indicated no advantage in using the smaller slit width in discriminating ILS at different SUN scores although it provided higher axial resolution.ConclusionsThe lock-in–based spot fluorometer is reliable for measurement of ILS with high precision and accuracy.The measured ILS correlates linearly with SUN scores and can be used to provide a higher granularity for recording aqueous flare.Translational RelevanceThe instrument can be used in the clinical management of uveitis and drug development toward uveitis.
“…The breakdown of the blood–aqueous barrier (BAB) and the appearance of inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber (A/C) are the hallmarks of uveitis. 1–3 The collapse of BAB results in the release of serum proteins into A/C. The inflammatory cells and proteins scatter light (i.e., Tyndall effect) giving rise to aqueous flare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inflammatory cells and proteins scatter light (i.e., Tyndall effect) giving rise to aqueous flare. 1,3 One conventional approach to scoring the severity of uveitis is based on grading the intensity of aqueous flare using slit-lamp biomicroscopy as per Standard Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) scoring system. 4 According to SUN classification, the aqueous flare is graded 0 in the absence of any notable flare, 1+ for faint flare, 2+ for moderate flare (iris and lens details clear), 3+ for marked flare (iris and lens details are hazy), and 4+ for intense flare (fibrin in the aqueous humor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The scoring system, albeit subjective, is frequently employed in the clinical management of uveitis. 1,3–5 The subjective nature of SUN scoring leads to significant intra- and interobserver variability. Moreover, the grading does not offer sufficient granularity (i.e., subdivisions between 0 to 1+, 1+ to 2+, and 2+ to 3+) that would be essential for evaluation of the efficacy of drugs or modalities of drug delivery toward the treatment of uveitis.…”
PurposeTo evaluate a custom-made ocular fluorometer for detection of intensity of light scatter (ILS) from the anterior chamber (A/C) as an objective measure of aqueous flare.MethodsThe fluorometer, equipped with a lock-in amplifier, was employed in the scatter mode to detect ILS from A/C. Measurements were performed with two illumination slit widths of 0.5 and 0.25 mm. The axial resolution at these slit widths were 80 and 200 μm, respectively. Healthy and pseudophakic eyes, with grade 0 Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) score, were employed as control subjects. ILS was also recorded in a cohort of patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and showed grades 1+ or 2+ on postoperative days 1 and 4.ResultsThe inter- and intraobserver variabilities in the measurement of ILS were not significant. In cataract patients, ILS was significantly higher on postoperative day 1 relative to healthy eyes. By day 4, ILS decreased significantly and was only marginally different from ILS in quiet pseudophakic eyes or healthy eyes. Eyes with higher SUN scores showed proportionately increased ILS. The receiver-operator characteristic analysis indicated no advantage in using the smaller slit width in discriminating ILS at different SUN scores although it provided higher axial resolution.ConclusionsThe lock-in–based spot fluorometer is reliable for measurement of ILS with high precision and accuracy.The measured ILS correlates linearly with SUN scores and can be used to provide a higher granularity for recording aqueous flare.Translational RelevanceThe instrument can be used in the clinical management of uveitis and drug development toward uveitis.
“…This phenomenon is featured by influx of serum proteins and inflammatory cells into the aqueous humour of anterior and posterior chamber as a consequence of BAB breakdown. In the aqueous of anterior chamber these elements can be detected quantitatively using laser flare photometry [5].…”
Background: This study compared the intensity of blood-aqueous barrier breakdown in diabetic patients after phacoemulsification with heparin surface-modified and non-modified intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
Material and methods: In this prospective trial, 68 diabetic patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: 33 patients with heparin surface-modified IOL implants (group 1) and 35 patients with standard hydrophobic IOL implants (group 2). Blood-aqueous barrier breakdown was assessed using a Laser Flare Meter 1 day, 7 days, 14 days, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Results: On postoperative days 1 and 7, the mean flare value was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1. On day 14, the mean flare value in both groups was similar and then higher in group 2.
Conclusions: The implantation of foldable heparin-coated IOLs led to a lower intensity and faster recovery of blood-aqueous barrier breakdown postoperatively.
“…LFCP became available in 1988 and uses the light scattering properties of AC particles to quantify the concentration of inflammatory materials in the aqueous humor. It has been primarily validated as a tool for measuring AC flare, 10 the cloudy appearance given to the aqueous during inflammation, however several models also have the ability to count AC cells. AS-OCT provides cross-sectional scans of the AC and can capture cells in aqueous humor as hyper-reflective dots.…”
Purpose: New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates. Methods: Using standard systematic review methodology, we identified and tabulated the outcomes of studies reporting reliability and correlation between instrument-based measurements and clinician AC cell grading. Results: From 3470 studies, 6 reported correlation between an instrument-based AC cell count to clinician grading. The two instruments were optical coherence tomography (OCT) and laser flare-cell photometry (LFCP). Correlation between clinician grading and LFCP was 0.66-0.87 and 0.06-0.97 between clinician grading and OCT. OCT volume scans demonstrated correlation between 0.75 and 0.78. Line scans in the middle AC demonstrated higher correlation (0.73-0.97) than in the inferior AC (0.06-0.56). Conclusion: AC cell count by OCT and LFP can achieve high levels of correlation with clinician grading, whilst offering additional advantages of speed, automation, and objectivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.