1988
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(88)80027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser excitation of O2(b1Σg+, ν′ = 0, 1, 2) - rates and channels of energy transfer and quenching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause for the disagreement is unknown, but it is not likely due to the presence of trace water vapor, because ca. 3% of water impurity would be required in order to make our result consistent with that of Wildt, et al [13], but the water content is less than 20 ppm in the CO2 gas used in this study, according to the manufacturer's specifications (Matheson).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cause for the disagreement is unknown, but it is not likely due to the presence of trace water vapor, because ca. 3% of water impurity would be required in order to make our result consistent with that of Wildt, et al [13], but the water content is less than 20 ppm in the CO2 gas used in this study, according to the manufacturer's specifications (Matheson).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…0 2 ( ' X g t ) deactivation rate constants obtained from the two approaches described above are generally in good agreement, but small differences exist. For example, the 0z(lZg+) deactivation by C02 has been measured in several studies, but the two most recent ones seem to give smaller rate constants [13,14]; due to its importance in the atmospheres of Mars and Venus, it is worthwhile to investigate this reaction again. The deactivation of 02( 'Zg+)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is not clear why the results of Filseth et al are lower than all the other reported values; perhaps, they had an error in measuring water vapor concentration. The temperature dependence of the reaction is taken from the only reported value of Dunlea et al Wildt et al [1455] report that the yield of O 2 ( 1 Δ) greater than 90%. There are no thermodynamically allowed reactive channels for this reaction.…”
Section: Notes Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O 2 ( 1 Σ) + H 2 . The rate coefficient for this reaction at, or around 298 K, has been measured by KohseHoinghaus and Stuhl [734], Braithwaite et al, [174], Choo and Leu, [264], Singh and Setser, [1197], Wildt et al, [1455], Michelangeli et al, [922], Borrell and Richards, [164], Hohmann et al [594], and Talukdar et al [1283]. k(298K) was derived from the results of all, but two, of the above studies.…”
Section: Notes Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation