2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-evoked potentials: normative values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
98
3
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
19
98
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…LEP amplitudes have been reported by other studies to significantly decrease with age, whereas latency and the interside difference of amplitude are not influenced by age. Similarly, gender was reported to have no effect on both latency and amplitude of LEP [45]. Our general finding of LEP amplitude increases according to stimulus intensity or decreases due to habituation are in good accordance with the results of other groups [29,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LEP amplitudes have been reported by other studies to significantly decrease with age, whereas latency and the interside difference of amplitude are not influenced by age. Similarly, gender was reported to have no effect on both latency and amplitude of LEP [45]. Our general finding of LEP amplitude increases according to stimulus intensity or decreases due to habituation are in good accordance with the results of other groups [29,44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to this criterion we identified 21 patients exceeding the amplitude criterion. Higher cut off criteria were reported by Beydoun et al [7] (28%), Hansen and Treede [19] (35%) or by Truini et al [45] (39%) using similar stimuli. Even if we apply the 40% criterion there were still 13 patients with pathological side-to-side amplitude differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…14 patients were affected by thoracic [12]. We then classified LEP signals as follows: standard signal = normal, pathologic signal = pathologic, absent signal = absent.…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal was considered absent when LEP = 0, whereas the cut off of LEP values were related to standard values (see reference Truini et al, 2005) [12].…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful pathophysiologic information in facial pain syndromes also comes from trigeminal LEPs, currently the most reliable and agreed method of investigating small fibre function [5,25,26].…”
Section: Findings In Facial Neuropathic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%