2013
DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.002470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser ablation–laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for the measurement of total elemental concentration in soils

Abstract: The performances of traditional laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and laser ablation-LIBS (LA-LIBS) were compared by quantifying the total elemental concentration of potassium in highly heterogeneous solid samples, namely soils. Calibration curves for a set of fifteen samples with a wide range of potassium concentrations were generated. The LA-LIBS approach produced a superior linear response different than the traditional LIBS scheme. The analytical response of LA-LIBS was tested with a large set of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, the main advantages of LIBS are the potential for soil analyses with minimal sample preparation, the speed of processing samples and the low cost of analysis, compared with dry combustion reference methods. However, LIBS has some precision limitations with regard to variation in the physical and chemical properties of the different materials present in soil, known as matrix effects [12] [14] [16]. After these limitations have been solved and the system has been calibrated using samples with known concentrations of an element of interest, LIBS has been used for determining metals, minerals, C and other important elements in soil [11] [12]; therefore, there is great potential for the development of portable LIBS equipment for the field-based quantification of C in soil [8] [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the main advantages of LIBS are the potential for soil analyses with minimal sample preparation, the speed of processing samples and the low cost of analysis, compared with dry combustion reference methods. However, LIBS has some precision limitations with regard to variation in the physical and chemical properties of the different materials present in soil, known as matrix effects [12] [14] [16]. After these limitations have been solved and the system has been calibrated using samples with known concentrations of an element of interest, LIBS has been used for determining metals, minerals, C and other important elements in soil [11] [12]; therefore, there is great potential for the development of portable LIBS equipment for the field-based quantification of C in soil [8] [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, LA-ICPMS is by far the more common technique for elemental imaging of biometals and toxicological metals in tissues than LA-ICPOES. Another variation on laser sampling is to detect the atomic excitation spectrum directly from the ablated plume, a technique known as laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) (Pareja et al, 2013). LA techniques provide excellent analytical sensitivity in atmospheric or relatively low vacuum conditions.…”
Section: General Overview Of Elemental Imaging Techniques For Biologimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single pulse and double pulse LIBS were compared at the determination of K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Na and Mn in 63 soil samples applying PLSR and SVR [22]. Further work describes the application of the laser ablation-LIBS method for the determination of Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na and K in soil samples [23], the univariate analysis of Ca, Mg, P, Fe and Na [24], and the analysis of Ba, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, V and Zn applying a multilayer perceptron ANN [25]. A special focus was the determination of the organic, inorganic and total carbon content for characterizing the soils in agriculture and the carbon sequestration potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These investigations started with univariate analysis of the total carbon content using the two C lines at 193 nm [26,27] and 247.9 nm [28]. Later, multivariate methods such as PLSR [29][30][31], Lasso and multivariate regression with covariance estimation [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] were applied, which also allowed the differentiation of inorganic and organic C. Multivariate approaches were also used to determine further soil parameters such as soil pH [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%