Las tablets como herramientas educativas para la infancia. Neox Kidz, un estudio de caso

Martín, Inmaculada Sánchez-Labella

doi:10.15213/redes.n12.p46

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For his part, Cuixart (2006) considers how electronic screens are, for the children he calls "high risk", an escape route to an unreal world where life is seen with different eyes. According to Martín (2016) almost 80% of children frequently use this new device for entertainment, which gives them autonomy and freedom to access a multitude of content; therefore, the smallest are not finding educational content in them. Kaur et al (2019) established that the burden of screen time ranged from 21% to 98% in middle-income countries, and from 10% to 93.7% in high-income countries.…”

Section: Screens and Device Use In Early Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sleep, physical activity and screens in 0-4 years Spanish children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Were the WHO recommendations met?

Arufe-Giráldez¹,

Sanmiguel-Rodríguez²,

Zagalaz-Sánchez³

et al. 2020

jhse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned in recent years about child physical inactivity. The pandemic caused by COVID-19 meant in many countries the establishment of a period of confinement with the deprivation of movement of children. The aim of this paper is to analyse whether, during the period of confinement, the WHO recommendations regarding sleep, physical activity and the use of technological devices in children under 5 years of age resident in Spain were met. The sample was composed of 280 Spanish children. The results confirm high values in the use of screens, especially television (M = 65.33), followed by tablets (M = 17.10) and mobile phones (M = 8.34). Physical activity levels were detected to be lower than recommended, with an average of 31.81 minutes versus the recommended 180 minutes. As for sleep hours, the recommendations were minimally fulfilled (M = 10.73; SD = 1.72). It is concluded that the period of confinement may have been an obstacle to complying with WHO recommendations regarding the practice of physical activity and screens in children under 5 years of age, which may have further aggravated the health of children in relation to pathologies associated with sedentary life.

show abstract

Section: Screens and Device Use In Early Childhoodmentioning

confidence: 99%