2011
DOI: 10.1075/dia.28.2.03sim
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngeal stop systems in contact

Abstract: This article examines the linguistic forces at work in present-day second language and bilingual acquisition of laryngeal contrasts, and to what extent these can give us insight into the origin of laryngeal systems of Germanic voicing languages like Dutch, with its contrast between prevoiced and unaspirated stops. The results of present-day child and adults second language acquisition studies reveal that both imposition and borrowing may occur when the laryngeal systems of a voicing and an aspirating language … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar influences on English have been reported from other languages, as cited above, and current work by Simon (2011) on Dutch learners of English lends empirical second language acquisition support to the arguments and evidence presented by Salmons (2003, 2008) that the "voicing language" stops of Modern Dutch (contrasting voiceless unaspirated with voiced) likely emerged out of the typical Germanic "aspirating language" type (contrasting heavily aspirated with weakly voiced stops) through L2 learning contact with a Romance-type system. Underscoring the synchronic variability of this kind of influence according to the dominant ambient language, Sancier & Fowler (1997:421) report that "Acoustic measurements of our speaker's voiceless stops produced in both Brazilian Portuguese [Romance system] and English [Germanic] show that, whereas her VOTs are always shorter for productions in Brazilian Portuguese than in English, VOTs of stops produced in both languages are shorter after a several month stay in Brazil than after a several month stay in the United States.…”
Section: Phonetic Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar influences on English have been reported from other languages, as cited above, and current work by Simon (2011) on Dutch learners of English lends empirical second language acquisition support to the arguments and evidence presented by Salmons (2003, 2008) that the "voicing language" stops of Modern Dutch (contrasting voiceless unaspirated with voiced) likely emerged out of the typical Germanic "aspirating language" type (contrasting heavily aspirated with weakly voiced stops) through L2 learning contact with a Romance-type system. Underscoring the synchronic variability of this kind of influence according to the dominant ambient language, Sancier & Fowler (1997:421) report that "Acoustic measurements of our speaker's voiceless stops produced in both Brazilian Portuguese [Romance system] and English [Germanic] show that, whereas her VOTs are always shorter for productions in Brazilian Portuguese than in English, VOTs of stops produced in both languages are shorter after a several month stay in Brazil than after a several month stay in the United States.…”
Section: Phonetic Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, speakers of voicing languages face extreme difficulty in learning English-voiced stops. Studies by Nasukawa (2010), Shimizu (2011), andSimon (2011), among others, have already demonstrated such literature. Native speakers of English differentiate between voiced and voiceless unaspirated stops of English based on other acoustic correlates or the complementary distribution between these two phonemic categories in many contexts.…”
Section: Previous Studies Relevant To the Current Topicmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Languages like Arabic (Flege & Port, 1981), Saraiki , Dutch (Simon, 2009(Simon, , 2011, Spanish (Flege & Eefting, 1988), Russian (Backley, 2011), Japanese (Shimizu, 2011), Hungarian (Lisker & Abramson, 1964, etc. are considered voicing languages but German (Hamann, 2011), English (Honeybone, 2005), Swedish, Korean, Icelandic (Backley, 2011), etc.…”
Section: The Voiced Plosives /B D G/mentioning
confidence: 99%