2010
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181d27fb4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngeal Mask Airway or Endotracheal Tube for Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy

Abstract: The LMA technique showed definite advantages regarding visualization of relevant tracheal structures and the dilation process compared with an ETT. This may be especially relevant in the hands of inexperienced intensivists and in cases of difficult patient anatomy where improved structural visualization optimizes operating conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous studies reported that FOB via LMA during PDT may improve both visualization and ventilation [5,6]. Linstedt et al [6] found the LMA group more advantageous in mechanical ventilation and monitorization over ETT group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some previous studies reported that FOB via LMA during PDT may improve both visualization and ventilation [5,6]. Linstedt et al [6] found the LMA group more advantageous in mechanical ventilation and monitorization over ETT group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effectiveness (the visualization and identification of relevant airway structures) of EtView TVT or video-assisted FOB via ETT during PDT procedure was evaluated using a standardized 4-step rating scale from 1 to 4 (1: very good; 2: good, mostly visible; 3: poorly visible, mostly unrecognized; 4: any of the anatomic landmarks does not recognized) adopted from Linstedt et al [6]. The following steps were evaluated:…”
Section: Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before our study, there were only three randomised trials, all of which used first-generation LMA devices and gave conflicting outcomes. Ambesh et al [4] found that the classic LMA was inferior to a tracheal tube, whereas Lindstedt et al [9] and Dosemeci et al [5] found the exact opposite. Our rationale for choosing to study the LMA Supreme against our standard tracheal tube technique was because we were aware that it appeared to perform adequately in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure and ventilation [10][11][12][13] and our current second generation of LMA, the ProSeal â , was being phased out in our institutions in favour of single-use devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine use of endoscopy during the procedure [31], use of ultrasound to identify midline vessels [32] and use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) [33] or ProSeal LMA [34] to improve visibility of intratracheal structures may all improve safety.…”
Section: Problems Relating To Tracheostomymentioning
confidence: 99%