2020
DOI: 10.1177/0194599820965910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngeal Leukoplakia: State of the Art Review

Abstract: Objective This state-of-the-art article reviews the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of vocal fold leukoplakia, with focus on recent advances. It focuses on the clinical challenges that otolaryngologists face balancing both oncological efficacy and functional outcomes in leukoplakia and presents the current philosophies and techniques to consider when managing such patients. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE. Review Methods We conducted a detailed review of publications related to vocal cord and laryngeal leu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Regarding vocal cord leukoplakia, there remain active discussions within the medical community on malignant potential and desired degree of surgical care (biopsy vs complete microflap removal), as well as the role of nonoperative management, use of angiolytic lasers, and potential for office-based treatment. [11][12][13][14] Correlations between pathologic classification and biologic behavior have been historically poor such that the World Health Organization recently simplified recommended pathologic categorization for vocal fold dysplasia. 15 Given the variations in care that patients may receive depending on the management approach that is recommended by the otolaryngologist, it is important for patients to have access to readable and understandable online materials to learn about available treatment options and participate in informed decision making.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Regarding vocal cord leukoplakia, there remain active discussions within the medical community on malignant potential and desired degree of surgical care (biopsy vs complete microflap removal), as well as the role of nonoperative management, use of angiolytic lasers, and potential for office-based treatment. [11][12][13][14] Correlations between pathologic classification and biologic behavior have been historically poor such that the World Health Organization recently simplified recommended pathologic categorization for vocal fold dysplasia. 15 Given the variations in care that patients may receive depending on the management approach that is recommended by the otolaryngologist, it is important for patients to have access to readable and understandable online materials to learn about available treatment options and participate in informed decision making.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the proposed treatments, there is surgical excision by various techniques (scalpel, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, laser or vaporization), drug treatment, topical or systemic (antiinflammatory drugs, antifungal, retinoic, carotenoid, folic acid), abandonment of aggravating addictions (cigarette and alcohol), and monitoring. 4,8,16,18,27 In our study, we evaluated the non-surgical treatment of vocal fold leukoplakia with vitamin A, and we noted that 62% of the lesions disappeared completely (34%) or showed partial improvement (28%) after treatment, with statistical difference in the pre and posttreatment moments in favor of using the medication (►Table 1). However, in eight vocal folds, there was an increase in the size of the leukoplakia (38%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For other authors, these rates are higher, around 67% in smokers. 8 Leukoplakic lesions of the larynx can be found in one or both vocal folds. Other injuries associated with smoking may also be present, such as Reinke's edema and polyps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection is the strongest prognostic factor affecting the patients' survival. However, the biopsy technique has some limitations, as mucosal sampling could underestimate the severity of the lesion first because of the poor depth of biopsy, then because of the histological heterogeneity of broader lesions [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%