Larval source management for malaria control in Africa: myths and reality

Abstract

As malaria declines in many African countries there is a growing realization that new interventions need to be added to the front-line vector control tools of long-lasting impregnated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) that target adult mosquitoes indoors. Larval source management (LSM) provides the dual benefits of not only reducing numbers of house-entering mosquitoes, but, importantly, also those that bite outdoors. Large-scale LSM was a highly effective method of malaria control in the first half of the twentieth century, but was largely disbanded in favour of IRS with DDT. Today LSM continues to be used in large-scale mosquito abatement programmes in North America and Europe, but has only recently been tested in a few trials of malaria control in contemporary Africa. The results from these trials show that hand-application of larvicides can reduce transmission by 70-90% in settings where mosquito larval habitats are defined but is largely ineffectual where habitats are so extensive that not all of them can be covered on foot, such as areas that experience substantial flooding. Importantly recent evidence shows that LSM can be an effective method of malaria control, especially when combined with LLINs. Nevertheless, there are a number of misconceptions or even myths that hamper the advocacy for LSM by leading international institutions and the uptake of LSM by Malaria Control Programmes. Many argue that LSM is not feasible in Africa due to the high number of small and temporary larval habitats for Anopheles gambiae that are difficult to find and treat promptly. Reference is often made to the Ross-Macdonald model to reinforce the view that larval control is ineffective. This paper challenges the notion that LSM cannot be successfully used for malaria control in African transmission settings by highlighting historical and recent successes, discussing its potential in an integrated vector management approach working towards malaria elimination and critically reviewing the most common arguments that are used against the adoption of LSM.

Comparative structural and functional analysis of the larval and adult dorsal vessel and its role in hemolymph circulation in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae

“…Specifically, the data presented herein provide novel insights into larval circulatory physiology and describe numerous differences between the larval and adult dorsal vessel, providing a developmental perspective on this organ system. Larvae are a common target in mosquito control strategies (Fillinger and Lindsay, 2011) and many chemical and biological pesticides exert their effect at the larval stage after penetrating the cuticle or midgut and circulating throughout the hemocoel (Favia et al, 2007;OtienoAyayo et al, 2008;Paily et al, 2012). Furthermore, numerous mosquito-borne pathogens must complete an obligate migration from the midgut to the salivary glands that involves traversing the hemocoel, where they are subject to hemolymph flow currents (Hillyer et al, 2007).…”

Toxicity on Dengue Mosquito Vectors Through Myristica fragrans-Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanorods, and Their Cytotoxic Effects on Liver Cancer Cells (HepG2)

“…By targeting the larval stages, mosquitoes are killed before they disperse to human habitations. Mosquito larvae, unlike adults, cannot change their habitat to avoid control activities [9]. Recent emphasis has been placed on plant materials that demonstrate mosquitocidal properties against important mosquito vectors.…”

Malaria in Middle Childhood and Adolescence

“…However, achieving a significant reduction in malaria transmission in many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa is difficult because of the multiplicity and changing nature of breeding sites of the main vector species, such as Anopheles gambiae (Fillinger and Lindsay 2011). It is unlikely that encouraging schoolchildren to destroy potential breeding sites of An.…”