2008
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larval morphology of the brooding clam Lasaea adansonii (Gmelin, 1791) (Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Galeommatoidea)

Abstract: The strongly modified mode of development of the small and brooding galeommatoid bivalve Lasaea adansonii (Gmelin, 1791) [syn. Lasaea rubra (Montagu, 1803)] has been studied by means of transmission and scanning electron microscopy and by fluorescent staining of the muscular system and of two neurotracers, FMRFamide and serotonin. In addition, two developmental stages were visualized using computer-aided 3D-reconstruction. All larval stages of L. adansonii lack ciliary rings. The apical organ appears invaginat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results and recent data from the literature (Haszprunar and Wanninger 2000;McDougall et al 2006;Altnöder and Haszprunar 2008) suggest that myogenesis in molluscs is a highly dynamic and potentially variable process. Such a "flexible" developmental program of the larval cells in M. trossulus and other species might be regarded as a prerequisite for the evolution of the wide variety of striated and smooth muscles seen in larval and adult molluscs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Our results and recent data from the literature (Haszprunar and Wanninger 2000;McDougall et al 2006;Altnöder and Haszprunar 2008) suggest that myogenesis in molluscs is a highly dynamic and potentially variable process. Such a "flexible" developmental program of the larval cells in M. trossulus and other species might be regarded as a prerequisite for the evolution of the wide variety of striated and smooth muscles seen in larval and adult molluscs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Myogenesis in bivalves has so far been investigated to a surprisingly little extent, but the few data available suggest the presence of highly complex retractor systems in their veliger larvae, also in certain semi-direct developing (brooding) species (Meisenheimer 1901 ;Altnöder and Haszprunar 2008 ;Wanninger et al 2008 ;Dyachuk and Odintsova 2009 ). An additional ventral larval retractor system is present in Dreissena , Mytilus , Pecten , and Lyrodus (shipworm) larvae (Meisenheimer 1901 ;Cragg 1985 ;Dyachuk and Odintsova 2009 ;Wurzinger-Mayer et al 2014 ), but their almost opposite projection relative to the gastropod accessory (mantle) retractor argues against homology of these muscles.…”
Section: Myogenesis In Conchiferansmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Likewise for positional reasons, the paired accessory foot retractor in L. pedicellatus most likely corresponds to the “anterior retractor” described for O. edulis, M. edulis, L. adansonii, P. inaequivalvis and A. cellensis [22,25,30-32] (Table 2), although most studies do not provide enough details to unequivocally settle this issue. In Pecten maximus unidentified fibres, which emerge from either end of the anterior bundle of the anterior adductor, extend along the bodywall lining [24] and, according to their position, they are likely homologous to the accessory foot retractor of L. pedicellatus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The massive foot retractors in the larva of Lyrodus pedicellatus attach in a posterior area near the hinge and, due to their similar relative position in the larval body, are considered homologous to the posterior retractors of the pteriomorphans Ostrea edulis and Mytilus edulis, the heterodonts Lasaea adansonii and Pandora inaequivalvis and the palaeoheterodont Anodonta cellensis (the foot retractors in O. edulis have previously been described as “cruciform retractor” because their medial bundles cross the median body plane) ([22,23,25,30-32]; Table 2). Likewise for positional reasons, the paired accessory foot retractor in L. pedicellatus most likely corresponds to the “anterior retractor” described for O. edulis, M. edulis, L. adansonii, P. inaequivalvis and A. cellensis [22,25,30-32] (Table 2), although most studies do not provide enough details to unequivocally settle this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation