2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352006000400018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larval density, temperature and biological aspects of Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Abstract: The effect of larval density on the survival, fecundity and body size at two temperatures in experimental populations of C. megacephala was studied. No effect from simultaneous influence of density and temperature on life history characteristics of C. megacephala was found. Significant effects of density and temperature on survival, fecundity and body size were observed. The importance of these results for the population dynamics of C. megacephala is discussed.Keywords: Chrysomya megacephala, density-dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We inferred that conspeciÞc larvae did not greatly inßuence the oviposition preference of C. megacephala. Although competition might be a very important factor affecting blow ßy Þtness, when the larval density was higher, a negative correlation was shown between density and survivorship, but when the density was lower, the dependence between density and survivorship was not signiÞcant (Reigada andGodoy 2006, Shiao andYeh 2008). In this test, the conspeciÞc larval density might not have reached the competitive stress threshold that would inßuence the oviposition preference of C. megacephala.…”
Section: Influence Of Intra-and Interspecific Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We inferred that conspeciÞc larvae did not greatly inßuence the oviposition preference of C. megacephala. Although competition might be a very important factor affecting blow ßy Þtness, when the larval density was higher, a negative correlation was shown between density and survivorship, but when the density was lower, the dependence between density and survivorship was not signiÞcant (Reigada andGodoy 2006, Shiao andYeh 2008). In this test, the conspeciÞc larval density might not have reached the competitive stress threshold that would inßuence the oviposition preference of C. megacephala.…”
Section: Influence Of Intra-and Interspecific Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Reigada and Godoy () studied the effects of larval density on the dynamics of the fly Chrysomya megacephala at two temperatures in a laboratory environment and found that fecundity declines with increasing density and temperature, which may lead to a transition from a two‐point limit cycle to a stable equilibrium. While plant bug fecundity also declines with increasing density, fecundity exhibits a unimodal temperature response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model also predicts that mortality increases with increasing temperatures; however, temperature effects on population density are more complex as the underlying life-history and competitive traits are also temperature-dependent. Reigada and Godoy (2006) studied the effects of larval density on the dynamics of the fly Chrysomya megacephala at two temperatures in a laboratory environment and found that fecundity declines with increasing density and temperature, which may lead to a transition from a twopoint limit cycle to a stable equilibrium. While plant bug fecundity also declines with increasing density, fecundity exhibits a unimodal temperature response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because intraspecific competition is the major mechanism of negative densitydependent feedback underlying population regulation, a critical prerequisite for species coexistence. Empirical studies show that the effects of intraspecific competition on life-history traits is strongly temperature dependent (Ritchie 1996; Reigada and Godoy 2006;Laws and Belovsky 2010). However, theoretical work on temperature effects on species interactions has considered intraspecific competition to be temperature independent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%