2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2003.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larson–Sweedler theorem and the role of grouplike elements in weak Hopf algebras

Abstract: We extend the Larson-Sweedler theorem [Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969) 75] to weak Hopf algebras by proving that a finite dimensional weak bialgebra is a weak Hopf algebra iff it possesses a non-degenerate left integral. We show that the category of modules over a weak Hopf algebra is autonomous monoidal with semisimple unit and invertible modules. We also reveal the connection of invertible modules to left and right grouplike elements in the dual weak Hopf algebra. Defining distinguished left and right grouplike el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results are known also for the generalizations of Hopf algebras. Integrals for finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebras [14] over fields were studied in [16,25,26,11] and for finite-dimensional weak Hopf algebras [4,3] over fields in [3,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results are known also for the generalizations of Hopf algebras. Integrals for finite-dimensional quasi-Hopf algebras [14] over fields were studied in [16,25,26,11] and for finite-dimensional weak Hopf algebras [4,3] over fields in [3,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore (see p. 510 of [21]) (1) ) λ, S −1 a (1) a (2) = a (3) π L S −1 a (2) a (1) λ, S −1 a (1) a (2) = S S −1 a (3) S −1 a (2) a (1) λ, S −1 a (1) a (2) = a (1) λ, S −1 a a (2) . (8.14)…”
Section: Weak Hopf Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The dual basis of ϕ T does not follow easily from this because S does not relate them like it did ϕ L and ϕ R . It is time to introduce S := ν −1 S −1 by analogy with the Hopf case, where ν is the Nakayama automorphism of λ, therefore [21] ν = S −2 α where α(a) := σ a. So we have S(a) = σ −1 S(a), an algebra antiautomorphism of W .…”
Section: Weak Hopf Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a straightforward dualization of (22). Equation (23) The group G 0 ðHÞ of all trivial group-like elements is a normal subgroup in GðHÞ: Define * G GðHÞ ¼ GðHÞ=G 0 ðHÞ; the quotient group of GðHÞ by G 0 ðHÞ: Let g/ * g g denote the canonical projection from GðHÞ to * G GðHÞ: It turns out that * G GðHÞ plays a more important role than GðHÞ; as it possesses properties extending those of the group of group-like elements of a usual Hopf algebra.…”
Section: Group-like Elements In a Weak Hopf Algebramentioning
confidence: 97%