2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2020)196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-x resummation of off-diagonal deep-inelastic parton scattering from d-dimensional refactorization

Abstract: The off-diagonal parton-scattering channels g + γ* and q + ϕ* in deep-inelastic scattering are power-suppressed near threshold x → 1. We address the next-to-leading power (NLP) resummation of large double logarithms of 1 − x to all orders in the strong coupling, which are present even in the off-diagonal DGLAP splitting kernels. The appearance of divergent convolutions prevents the application of factorization methods known from leading power resummation. Employing d-dimensional consistency relations from requ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(95 reference statements)
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several new complications arise, which do not occur at leading power. The most puzzling one is the appearance of endpoint-divergent convolution integrals over products of component functions each depending on a single scale [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In some sense, such endpoint divergences indicate a failure of dimensional regularization and the MS subtraction scheme, because some of the 1/ n pole terms are not removed by renormalizing the individual component functions, and hence naive scale separation is violated.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)077mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new complications arise, which do not occur at leading power. The most puzzling one is the appearance of endpoint-divergent convolution integrals over products of component functions each depending on a single scale [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In some sense, such endpoint divergences indicate a failure of dimensional regularization and the MS subtraction scheme, because some of the 1/ n pole terms are not removed by renormalizing the individual component functions, and hence naive scale separation is violated.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)077mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We comment on the comparison with our work in section 4.4.3 Although important progress has been made, see e.g [16,37,39]…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A general resummation framework for soft-quark emissions is still under development (see e.g. [37][38][39] for recent process in the SCET framework).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples using direct QCD arguments include developing factorisation theorems for NLP contributions that extend their LP counterparts [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]; carrying out fixed-order studies that aim to motivate such formulae [50][51][52][53][54][55][56]; resumming NLP contributions by combining factorisation and renormalisation group arguments [26,[57][58][59][60][61]; and resumming specific contributions [62]. There is also an ever-growing body of work examining NLP effects in SCET, including identifying relevant operators contributing at NLP order and/or their mixing under renormalisation [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]; development of factorisation formulae [71][72][73][74]; and explicit studies for particular observables, either at fixed-order or resummed [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86]. This has pr...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%