Large wood loads in an urban stream: The role of recruitment limitation versus transport dominance

Abstract

Large wood (LW) has important physical and ecological functions in streams. Riparian vegetation is extensively removed during urban expansion, and urban streams may experience enhanced fluvial transport of LW due to flashy hydrology. In this study, LW loads were assessed for three reaches on North Buffalo Creek, an urban stream located in Greensboro, North Carolina, United States. These three reaches have similar hydrology but different riparian vegetation densities. We measured the frequencies and sizes of both in-channel LW and riparian vegetation across the three reaches. Our results showed that the recently reforested reach had greater LW volume (22.5 m 3 /km) compared to the unmanaged forested site (16 m 3 /km) and the site with low riparian vegetation density (4.78 m 3 /km). The difference in LW frequency among reaches was statistically significant (p ¼ :05). However, the difference in the volume of individual pieces was not significantly different across reaches (p ¼ :84Þ, indicating that a similar size of wood is recruited across the three sites. Our findings also showed that there is a positive relationship between riparian vegetation frequency and in-channel LW frequency, which are significantly related as a power function. Spatial lag models (integrating upstream riparian trees) did not show better results compared to a non-lagged model, suggesting that storage and recruitment were predominantly local and that the LW distribution at our reaches is limited by recruitment rather than dominated by fluvial transport. Our findings suggested that a fully forested watershed is not needed to provide some of the benefits of wood to urban streams.

Current progress in quantifying and monitoring instream large wood supply and transfer in rivers

“…Such estimates provide a basis for the development of river restoration strategies. However, the observed wood storage in most rivers is very likely to be below the natural range of variability (Blauch & Jefferson, 2019), as they are the result of centuries of wood removal for flood control, navigation and other purposes (Sigdel et al, 2023; Wohl, 2014; Wohl et al, 2017).…”