2002
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Visuospatial Sex Difference in Line Judgment: Possible Role of Attentional Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

13
86
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
13
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous experiment involving orchestral musicians, however, we found an age-related enhancement on Benton Judgment of Line Orientation (JOL) (Sluming et al, 2002) rather than the anticipated age-related decline found in nonmusicians. JOL is a relatively low-level visuospatial perceptual task (Collaer and Nelson, 2002) that is known to be partially subserved by similar neural networks supporting 3DMR (Barnes et al, 2000;Ng et al, 2001). We, therefore, also predicted agerelated enhancement in performing 3DMR by orchestral musicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In a previous experiment involving orchestral musicians, however, we found an age-related enhancement on Benton Judgment of Line Orientation (JOL) (Sluming et al, 2002) rather than the anticipated age-related decline found in nonmusicians. JOL is a relatively low-level visuospatial perceptual task (Collaer and Nelson, 2002) that is known to be partially subserved by similar neural networks supporting 3DMR (Barnes et al, 2000;Ng et al, 2001). We, therefore, also predicted agerelated enhancement in performing 3DMR by orchestral musicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A similar increase in visuospatial abilities through late adolescence was shown using a variation of the simple pen and paper Design Organization Test (DOT: Burggraaf, Frens, Hooge, & van der Geest, 2015), which provides a faster and easier way for measuring visuospatial ability than the lengthy Block Design Test (Killgore, Glahn, & Casasanto, 2005;Killgore & Gogel, 2014). In recent years, a reason for differences in performance between the sexes has been suggested to be that men and women apply differential weighting to geometrical reference cues (Collaer & Nelson, 2002;Holden, Duff-Canning, & Hampson, 2015). However, these differences in visuospatial abilities by sex, have only been found in tasks involving mental rotation (Linn & Petersen, 1985;Voyer, Voyer, & Bryden, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Males outperform females in spatial tasks, such as the water level test where a tilted glass of water is presented, and the subject is required to judge where the water level would be if the glass were placed upright (Robert & Ohlmann, 1994), reflecting better processing of physical systems in males. Other examples are mental rotation (Geary, Gilger, & Elliott-Miller, 1992) and line-angle judgement (Collaer & Nelson, 2002). Females have been found to perform better in episodic memory tasks involving face recognition (Yonker, Eriksson, Nilsson, & Herlitz, 2003) and object recognition (McGivern et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%