2018
DOI: 10.1080/17518369.2018.1427409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large versus small zooplankton in relation to temperature in the Arctic shelf region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 7-year studies from the Arctic shelf region with measurements repeated at the same time of the year (July/August), clearly confirmed that higher water temperatures favour the small zooplankton fractions represented (among others) by O . similis over larger ones 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 7-year studies from the Arctic shelf region with measurements repeated at the same time of the year (July/August), clearly confirmed that higher water temperatures favour the small zooplankton fractions represented (among others) by O . similis over larger ones 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Climate warming is altering the distribution of Arctic zooplankton in ways that could negatively affect the feeding success of young polar cod. For instance, a general decrease in the proportion of large zooplankton in Arctic seas (e.g., Balazy et al 2018 ; Møller and Nielsen 2019 ) and the northward penetration of the smaller C. finmarchicus (e.g., Beaugrand et al 2013 ) could reduce the availability of high-energy prey to polar cod larvae and juveniles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many examples of successful application of ChlF for studying the reaction of photosynthetic apparatus to different environmental stresses, such as light intensity (Cai andXu 2002, Živčák et al 2014), high and low temperature (Alam et al 2005, Oukarroum et al 2013), drought (Goltsev et al 2012, Abid et al 2017, salinity (Dąbrowski et al 2016, Allel et al 2018, heavy metals (Azevedo et al 2005, Baycu et al 2017, herbicides (Ferrell et al 2003) or nutrient deficiency (Cetner et al 2017, Kalaji et al 2017b. Moreover, ChlF is used in agriculture Rosenqvist 2004, Massacci et al 2008), forestry (Lapa et al 2017, Kučerová et al 2018, ecology (Bussotti 2004, Bąba et al 2012, climate change studies (Drusch et al 2017, Bałazy et al 2018, Pflug et al 2018, and vegetation research (Li et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%