2016
DOI: 10.26509/frbc-wp-201617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Vector Autoregressions with Stochastic Volatility and Flexible Priors

Abstract: Recent research has shown that a reliable vector autoregressive model (VAR) for forecasting and structural analysis of macroeconomic data requires a large set of variables and modeling time variation in their volatilities. Yet, there are no papers jointly allowing for stochastic volatilities and large datasets, due to computational complexity. Moreover, homoskedastic VAR models for large datasets so far restrict substantially the allowed prior distributions on the parameters. In this paper we propose a new Bay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most empirical macroeconomic applications, there is evidence of changes in volatility (although the mixed‐frequency VAR literature has mostly ignored this issue and worked with homoskedastic models). In this paper we adopt a popular multivariate stochastic volatility specification (see Carriero, Clark, & Marcellino, ; Cogley & Sargent, ). This decomposes the error covariance matrix as follows: normalΣt1=boldLboldDt1boldL, where boldL is n×n lower triangular matrix with a diagonal of ones: boldL=[]center center center centerarray1array0arrayarray0arraya1,1array1arrayarrayarrayarrayarrayarray0arrayan,1arrayarrayan,n1array1, and we define bolda=false(a1,1,a2,1,,an,1,a2,1,,an,n1false) as an m×1 vector.…”
Section: Mixed‐frequency Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most empirical macroeconomic applications, there is evidence of changes in volatility (although the mixed‐frequency VAR literature has mostly ignored this issue and worked with homoskedastic models). In this paper we adopt a popular multivariate stochastic volatility specification (see Carriero, Clark, & Marcellino, ; Cogley & Sargent, ). This decomposes the error covariance matrix as follows: normalΣt1=boldLboldDt1boldL, where boldL is n×n lower triangular matrix with a diagonal of ones: boldL=[]center center center centerarray1array0arrayarray0arraya1,1array1arrayarrayarrayarrayarrayarray0arrayan,1arrayarrayan,n1array1, and we define bolda=false(a1,1,a2,1,,an,1,a2,1,,an,n1false) as an m×1 vector.…”
Section: Mixed‐frequency Econometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For notational simplicity, let Π denote the collection of the VAR's coefficients. Note also that, to speed computation, we estimate the model with the triangularization approach developed in Carriero, Clark, and Marcellino (2016b). Estimates derived from the BVAR-SV model are based on samples of 5,000 retained draws, obtained by sampling a total of 30,000 draws, discarding the first 5,000, and retaining every 5th draw of the post-burn sample.…”
Section: Bvar-sv Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To speed computation, we estimate the model with the triangularization approach developed in Carriero, Clark, and Marcellino (2016b), using an independent Normal-Wishart prior. 5…”
Section: Impulse Response Estimates From Two-step Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations