2020
DOI: 10.14241/asgp.2020.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large tridactyl dinosaur tracks from the Early Jurassic of southern Gondwana – uppermost Elliot Formation, Upper Moyeni, Lesotho

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also possible that an unknown facultatively tridactyl archosaur could have potentially produced the tracks. Ornithischian and theropod body fossils are present in the Mesozoic rock record of southern African, and while the former is well-documented [ 59 ] the latter is scarce [ 60 , 61 ], with both regularly being ascribed as the trackmakers of various tridactyl tracks in the region [ 23 , 31 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 62 68 ]. The morphological features (e.g., digit width, total digit divarication angle) of the bird-like Trisauropodiscus are incompatible with these local, contemporaneous, similarly sized tridactyl tracks [ 23 , 64 ] and it is unlikely they were registered by the same tracemaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that an unknown facultatively tridactyl archosaur could have potentially produced the tracks. Ornithischian and theropod body fossils are present in the Mesozoic rock record of southern African, and while the former is well-documented [ 59 ] the latter is scarce [ 60 , 61 ], with both regularly being ascribed as the trackmakers of various tridactyl tracks in the region [ 23 , 31 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 62 68 ]. The morphological features (e.g., digit width, total digit divarication angle) of the bird-like Trisauropodiscus are incompatible with these local, contemporaneous, similarly sized tridactyl tracks [ 23 , 64 ] and it is unlikely they were registered by the same tracemaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%