2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large subunit ribosomal RNA gene variation and sequence heterogeneity of Dinophysis (Dinophyceae) species from Scottish coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA gene region, the sequences obtained in this study co-resided with most sequences assigned to species of the D. acuminata complex onto the well-supported Cluster I. Single nucleotide substitutions resulted in random branch lengths of several sequences without forming dichotomies, confirming the common appreciation of the high rDNA genes conservation within the complex that disallows for species identification (Edvardsen et al, 2003;Hart et al, 2007). It is worth noting also that sequences of erroneously identified dinoflagellate species, not re-verified by [ ( F i g .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In the phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA gene region, the sequences obtained in this study co-resided with most sequences assigned to species of the D. acuminata complex onto the well-supported Cluster I. Single nucleotide substitutions resulted in random branch lengths of several sequences without forming dichotomies, confirming the common appreciation of the high rDNA genes conservation within the complex that disallows for species identification (Edvardsen et al, 2003;Hart et al, 2007). It is worth noting also that sequences of erroneously identified dinoflagellate species, not re-verified by [ ( F i g .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In the case of Dinophysis, sequence comparisons of the D1-D2 LSU regions of different species have identified two major clades, and little variation between D acuminata, D. acuta and D. norvegica Claparè de et Lachmann (Edvardsen et al, 2003). Further, phylogeographical analysis based on LSU sequences was not successful to establish intra-specific differences between Dinophysis isolates from different locations (Hart et al, 2007).…”
Section: Dinophysis Acuminata Claparè De Et Lachmann and D Acutamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Molecular biology may provide powerful tools to improve identification of organisms in the laboratory, as well as in field samples. Due to the difficulties to establish species of Dinophysis in culture, very sensitive techniques for single-cell DNA amplification were developed (Marín et al, 2001a,b;Edvardsen et al, 2003;Hart et al, 2007;Kai et al, 2006). In the last years, these techniques have generated sequences for a rank of species of Dinophysis (RehnstamHolm et al, 2002;Edvardsen et al, 2003;Hart et al, 2007) and provided an important dataset for phylogenetic studies.…”
Section: Dinophysis Acuminata Claparè De Et Lachmann and D Acutamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell was 57.20 µm in length and 60.64 µm in height without anterior cingular lists. In the phylogenetic analysis our isolate appeared in the Dinophysis acuta lineage composed of isolates from Scotland and Ireland (Hart et al, 2007). The nucleotide sequence identity between our isolate and …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%