2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.104.184410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large spin-charge interconversion induced by interfacial spin-orbit coupling in a highly conducting all-metallic system

Abstract: Spin-charge interconversion in systems with spin-orbit coupling has provided a new route for the generation and detection of spin currents in functional devices for memory and logic such as spin-orbit torque switching in magnetic memories or magnetic-state reading in spin-based logic. Disentangling the bulk (spin Hall effect) from the interfacial (inverse spin galvanic effect) contribution has been a common issue to properly quantify the spin-charge interconversion in these systems, being the case of Au paradi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At V g = 15 V, θ SH λ s CuO x /gr = 1.80 ± 0.56 nm, which is 1 order of magnitude larger than the value at V g = 0 V (0.15 ± 0.20 nm). This is a remarkable result: while we have only low- Z elements in our material system (Cu, O, C), the value is higher than in conventional large SOC materials, such as heavy metals (0.2 nm for Pt, 0.34 nm for W) or metallic Rashba interfaces (0.3 nm for Ag/Bi, −0.17 nm for Cu/Au), and is of the same order of magnitude as in material systems such as topological insulators (2.1 nm for α-Sn), oxide 2DEGs (6.4 nm for LAO/STO), or heavy metal oxide/graphene heterostructures (1 nm for BiO x /graphene at 100 K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…At V g = 15 V, θ SH λ s CuO x /gr = 1.80 ± 0.56 nm, which is 1 order of magnitude larger than the value at V g = 0 V (0.15 ± 0.20 nm). This is a remarkable result: while we have only low- Z elements in our material system (Cu, O, C), the value is higher than in conventional large SOC materials, such as heavy metals (0.2 nm for Pt, 0.34 nm for W) or metallic Rashba interfaces (0.3 nm for Ag/Bi, −0.17 nm for Cu/Au), and is of the same order of magnitude as in material systems such as topological insulators (2.1 nm for α-Sn), oxide 2DEGs (6.4 nm for LAO/STO), or heavy metal oxide/graphene heterostructures (1 nm for BiO x /graphene at 100 K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The mere presence of hybrid interfaces implies a broken reflection symmetry and indicates the existence of a polar vector perpendicular to that edge, hence the system is gyrotropic and supports SGE. In normal hybrid structures containing interfaces between materials with substantial bulk SOC, a spin-to-charge conversion due to SGE has been a topic of extensive studies, both theoretically [64,[87][88][89] and experimentally [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. From the symmetry perspective it is irrelevant whether the SGE is mediated by SOC in the bulk of materials, comes from the surface Rashba band, or originates from the interfacial SOC and spin-flip scattering off the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] In these architectures, information is stored in a ferroelectric polarization state coupled to the magnetization direction of a ferromagnetic electrode. The magnetic state of the electrode is then read electrically using the spin‐to‐charge interconversion in either heavy metals, [ 2 ] Rashba interfaces, [ 3 ] or topological insulators. [ 4 ] In these mechanisms, the spin current produced by the ferromagnetic electrode is converted into a transverse charge current thanks to the spin orbit coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%