2021
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large sets avoiding linear patterns

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that for any dimension function h with h ≺ x d and for any countable set of linear patterns, there exists a compact set E with H h (E) > 0 avoiding all the given patterns. We also give several applications and recover results of Keleti, Maga, and Máthé.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We proved [17], improving a result from [9] and the linear case of [12,Theorem 6.1], that there are sets with full Hausdorff dimension avoiding countably many linear patterns (defined as zeros of linear functions) given in advance. Moreover, we got a more general result for dimension functions instead of Hausdorff dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We proved [17], improving a result from [9] and the linear case of [12,Theorem 6.1], that there are sets with full Hausdorff dimension avoiding countably many linear patterns (defined as zeros of linear functions) given in advance. Moreover, we got a more general result for dimension functions instead of Hausdorff dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A consequence of the Lebesgue density theorem is that any set E ⊂ R d of positive Lebesgue measure contains a homothetic copy of every finite set at all sufficiently small scales, so it is natural to seek conditions on sets of zero Lebesgue measure form which this remains true. Perhaps the most natural notion of size to consider is Hausdorff dimension but there are constructions (see for example [6,13,14,16,18,21]) which indicate that Hausdorff dimension cannot, in itself, detect the presence or absence of patterns in sets of Lebesgue measure zero, even in the most basic case of points in arithmetic progressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keleti [19] has constructed subsets of full dimension on R which contain no 3-term arithmetic progressions (or more generally similar copies of an a priori fixed set with 3 elements). For extensions and generalisations, and more results in this direction, see the papers [24] of Maga, [25] of Máthé, [9] of Denson, Łaba, and Zahl, and [39] of Yavicoli. Quite surprisingly, one may even construct subsets of R with full Hausdorff dimension and Fourier dimension which avoid 3-term arithmetic progressions: this counterintuitive construction is due to Shmerkin [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%