ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters couple the translocation of solutes across membranes to ATP hydrolysis. Crystal structures of the Escherichia coli maltose importer (MalFGK 2 ) in complex with its substrate binding protein (MalE) provided unprecedented insights in the mechanism of substrate translocation, leaving the MalE-transporter interactions still poorly understood. Using pulsed EPR and cross-linking methods we investigated the effects of maltose and MalE on complex formation and correlated motions of the MalK 2 nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs A TP-binding cassette (ABC) systems are found in all kingdoms of life, forming one of the largest protein superfamilies (1-4). ABC transporters comprise two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that form the translocation pathway and two nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) that bind and hydrolyze ATP. Based on biochemical and structural evidence, all ABC transporters are thought to function by an "alternate-access" mode, with the translocation path shuttling between an inward-facing and outward-facing conformation in response to substrate and ATP binding, the latter causing the NBD dimer to close (5).Canonical ABC importers are subdivided into type I and type II based on structural and biochemical evidence (6) and are dependent on extracellular (or periplasmic) substrate binding proteins (SBPs) (4), which play a crucial role in initial steps of the transport cycle (7-10). SBPs generally consist of two symmetrical lobes that rotate toward each other upon substrate binding (11).The type I maltose transporter of Escherichia coli/Salmonella is probably the best understood ABC transporter to date (12). It is composed of the periplasmic maltose binding protein, MalE, the membrane-integral subunits, MalF and MalG, and the nucleotidebinding subunits (NBDs), MalK 2 . The available crystal structures in the pretranslocation, ATP-, and vanadate-trapped states (13-16) have largely contributed to the understanding of the details of the inward-to outward-facing mechanism. The posthydrolytic state has not yet been crystallized, but data exist proposing this state to have a distinct structure from the other three known crystal snapshots (8, 9). MalE interacts with the transporter throughout the nucleotide cycle (15-18), and the X-ray structures revealed the switch of the binding protein from the liganded (closed) to the substrate-free (open) conformation concomitantly with ATP binding to the NBDs. Despite all these structural insights, the response of the transporter to substrate availability is poorly understood. Furthermore, the mechanism behind the stimulation of the ATPase activity of the transporter by unliganded MalE (10, 19) is still elusive (20,21).Our results show that the apo-and ADP-states of the transporter bind both open and closed MalE, but the complex adopts different periplasmic configurations. The ATP-state of the transporter can bind either closed MalE, inducing its opening and release of substrate to MalF or directly unliganded MalE, which generates a futile cycle. I...