2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.75.045805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale prediction of the parity distribution in the nuclear level density and application to astrophysical reaction rates

Abstract: A generalized method to calculate the excitation-energy dependent parity ratio in the nuclear level density is presented, using the assumption of Poisson distributed independent quasi particles combined with BCS occupation numbers. It is found that it is crucial to employ a sufficiently large model space to allow excitations both from low-lying shells and to higher shells beyond a single major shell. Parity ratios are only found to equilibrate above at least 5-10 MeV of excitation energy. Furthermore, an overs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NON-SMOKER WEB 5.0w code used here still stays close to the original NON-SMOKER code in the treatment of some of the nuclear properties required to calculate the cross sections and reaction rates but the internal modifications give rise to certain differences in the results, expected to yield improved predictions. Concerning the update of nuclear properties, of relevance here are mainly the inclusion of masses from Wapstra et al (2003); Audi et al (2003b) with the additions described elsewhere in this -30 -work, updated experimental information on ground and excited state spins and parities from Nudat 2.4, National Nuclear Data Center (2008), an improved prediction of ground state properties when no experimental information is available, and a parity-dependent level density (Mocelj et al 2007) to be used above the known experimental levels. The different spins and level densities as well as the parity treatment may lead to considerable changes in the predicted rates compared to the previous NON-SMOKER rates (Rauscher & Thielemann 2000).…”
Section: New Theory Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NON-SMOKER WEB 5.0w code used here still stays close to the original NON-SMOKER code in the treatment of some of the nuclear properties required to calculate the cross sections and reaction rates but the internal modifications give rise to certain differences in the results, expected to yield improved predictions. Concerning the update of nuclear properties, of relevance here are mainly the inclusion of masses from Wapstra et al (2003); Audi et al (2003b) with the additions described elsewhere in this -30 -work, updated experimental information on ground and excited state spins and parities from Nudat 2.4, National Nuclear Data Center (2008), an improved prediction of ground state properties when no experimental information is available, and a parity-dependent level density (Mocelj et al 2007) to be used above the known experimental levels. The different spins and level densities as well as the parity treatment may lead to considerable changes in the predicted rates compared to the previous NON-SMOKER rates (Rauscher & Thielemann 2000).…”
Section: New Theory Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Similar problems due to incomplete sets of experimentally determined excited states were also discussed in [24,57].) In the present work, the incomplete set of excited states was neglected in the SMARAGD calculations and instead the nuclear level density of [58] with the parity distribution of [59] was used above the ground state.…”
Section: B Comparison To Theory and Implications For The Stellar Ratementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Version 0.8.4s of the SMARAGD code made use of an updated level scheme from [49], also included in the 2010 version of NuDAT [48]. Above the last included discrete state, a refitted version of the level density of [51] is applied and additionally an energy-dependent parity distribution [52].…”
Section: A Astrophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%