2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale phylogeny of chameleons suggests African origins and Eocene diversification

Abstract: Oceanic dispersal has emerged as an important factor contributing to biogeographic patterns in numerous taxa. Chameleons are a clear example of this, as they are primarily found in Africa and Madagascar, but the age of the family is post-Gondwanan break-up. A Malagasy origin for the family has been suggested, yet this hypothesis has not been tested using modern biogeographic methods with a dated phylogeny. To examine competing hypotheses of African and Malagasy origins, we generated a dated phylogeny using bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
172
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
11
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…vencesi Andreone, Mattioli, Jesu &Randrianirina, 2001 of the C. furcifer group, and C. boettgeri (Boulenger, 1888), C. fallax (Mocquard, 1900), C. gallus (Günther, 1877), C. guibei (Hillenius, 1959), C. linotum, C. nasutum (Duméril & Bibron, 1836, and C. vohibola Gehring, Ratsoavina, Vences & Glaw, 2011 of the C. nasutum group. Calumma cucullatum (Gray, 1831) is not considered a part of the C. furcifer group in the strict sense (see phylogeny in Tolley et al 2013). In addition C. peyrierasi was investigated according to its phylogenetic position in the C. nasutum group -but it is clearly separated from the other species of the C. nasutum group (Tolley et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…vencesi Andreone, Mattioli, Jesu &Randrianirina, 2001 of the C. furcifer group, and C. boettgeri (Boulenger, 1888), C. fallax (Mocquard, 1900), C. gallus (Günther, 1877), C. guibei (Hillenius, 1959), C. linotum, C. nasutum (Duméril & Bibron, 1836, and C. vohibola Gehring, Ratsoavina, Vences & Glaw, 2011 of the C. nasutum group. Calumma cucullatum (Gray, 1831) is not considered a part of the C. furcifer group in the strict sense (see phylogeny in Tolley et al 2013). In addition C. peyrierasi was investigated according to its phylogenetic position in the C. nasutum group -but it is clearly separated from the other species of the C. nasutum group (Tolley et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calumma cucullatum (Gray, 1831) is not considered a part of the C. furcifer group in the strict sense (see phylogeny in Tolley et al 2013). In addition C. peyrierasi was investigated according to its phylogenetic position in the C. nasutum group -but it is clearly separated from the other species of the C. nasutum group (Tolley et al 2013). The same specimen, which was analysed genetically in Tolley et al (2013), was used for morphological measurements together with three more specimens of the same series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations