2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16460.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale peculiar motions and cosmic acceleration

Abstract: Recent surveys seem to support bulk peculiar velocities well in excess of those anticipated by the standard cosmological model. In view of these results, we consider here some of the theoretical implications of large-scale drift motions. We find that observers with small, but finite, peculiar velocities have generally different expansion rates than the smooth Hubble flow. In particular, it is possible for observers with larger than the average volume expansion at their location, to experience apparently accele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is possible to say what would would be necessary for the non-dust terms to have a significant effect. For theṅ α terms to be important in (3.14)-(3.16),ṅ αṅ α would have to be of the order of the square of the expansion rate in a large fraction of space (contrary to what was argued in [75]; see also [76]), or the contraction of the energy flux andṅ α would have to be of the order of the product of the average energy density and the average expansion rate. In order for the pressure or the anisotropic stress to be important, they would have to be on average of the same order of magnitude as the average energy density.…”
Section: Evolution Equations For the Scale Factormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is possible to say what would would be necessary for the non-dust terms to have a significant effect. For theṅ α terms to be important in (3.14)-(3.16),ṅ αṅ α would have to be of the order of the square of the expansion rate in a large fraction of space (contrary to what was argued in [75]; see also [76]), or the contraction of the energy flux andṅ α would have to be of the order of the product of the average energy density and the average expansion rate. In order for the pressure or the anisotropic stress to be important, they would have to be on average of the same order of magnitude as the average energy density.…”
Section: Evolution Equations For the Scale Factormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, we can achieve an approximation to a Copernican principle by considering arrays of localized Szekeres-II regions embedded in a spatially flat ΛCDM background by smooth matchings and thus evolving jointly with it, as in the "pancake models" derived and discussed in [22]. In fact, in that paper we presented a brief illustrative example of Szekeres-II regions characterized by an energy-momentum tensor like (6), with q a associated with CDM peculiar velocities as in ( 19), but with Λ = 0 (hence the matched FLRW background was an Einstein de Sitter model). We will consider in the following sections the case Λ > 0 of the above mentioned example.…”
Section: Dynamical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complement the interpretation of energy flux as noncomoving CDM, it is useful to compute the Hubble scalar for the non-comoving 4-velocityΘ =ĥ a bû b ;a withû a defined by (16). In the linear regime of peculiar velocities v a v a /c 2 1 we obtain the following relation [6]…”
Section: Non-comoving Cdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,[23][24][25] On the other hand, when linearized around a FriedmannLemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model, these quasi-Newtonian models are consistent and provide a basis for the study of peculiar velocities in almost FLRW models. 18,19 It has been pointed out 26 that peculiar motion can locally mimic the effects of dark matter in regions of a dust-dominated FRW universe endowed with bulk peculiar velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%