2003
DOI: 10.1134/1.1633311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale nonlocality in “doubly special relativity” with an energy-dependent speed of light

Abstract: There are two major alternatives for violating the (usual) Lorentz invariance at large (Planckian) energies or momenta -either not all inertial frames (in the Planck regime) are equivalent (e.g., there is an effectively preferred frame) or the transformations from one frame to another are (nonlinearly) deformed ("doubly special relativity"). We demonstrate that the natural (and reasonable) assumption of an energy-dependent speed of light in the latter method goes along with violations of locality/separability … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still unclear why the latter nonlinear momenta should be the physically measured ones and there is a rich literature now devoted to the interpretation of DSR in momentum space. Such an interpretation should hopefully clarify some of the problems pointed out in the recent literature [38].…”
Section: B Deformed Special Relativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unclear why the latter nonlinear momenta should be the physically measured ones and there is a rich literature now devoted to the interpretation of DSR in momentum space. Such an interpretation should hopefully clarify some of the problems pointed out in the recent literature [38].…”
Section: B Deformed Special Relativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect, first noticed in Ref. [24] is the characteristic trait of the so-called relative locality [25,26]. The space-time resulting in such a way from the automaton dynamics is not "objective", in the sense that events that coincide for one observer may not for another boosted observer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present purpose without loss of generality we focus on the easiest d = 1 dimensional case. As for any DSR model, it turns out that the spacetime emerging from the automaton exhibits relative locality, namely the phenomenon according to which the coincidence of two events is observer-dependent [24][25][26].arXiv:1310.6760v1 [quant-ph] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations