2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2011.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large scale multiple robot visual mapping with heterogeneous landmarks in semi-structured terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main constraint comes from the fact that submaps cannot be updated and are only sent once on the network. The work of Vidal-Calleja et al in [226] also proposes an extension of submap SLAM, and more specifically of the hierarchical approach introduced in [31]. Only the topological map is exchanged inside the fleet and a global metric map cannot be recovered on the fly.…”
Section: B Decentralized Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main constraint comes from the fact that submaps cannot be updated and are only sent once on the network. The work of Vidal-Calleja et al in [226] also proposes an extension of submap SLAM, and more specifically of the hierarchical approach introduced in [31]. Only the topological map is exchanged inside the fleet and a global metric map cannot be recovered on the fly.…”
Section: B Decentralized Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [238], the authors propose to exchange maps only when vehicles can detect each other, which means that big amount of data will be sent punctually. Methods communicating only topological maps, like in [226] and [227], avoid this problem by providing very light maps.…”
Section: B Decentralized Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Points are usually augmented with descriptors for feature matching purposes. By matching 3-D points and lines, robots can estimate their relative poses and fuse their local maps to maintain geometric consistency and achieve effective cooperation in large-scale environments [189]. Robots may also maintain the position uncertainty of each point in the map for handling of dynamic objects [190].…”
Section: Cooperative Aerial Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most related works, the aerial robot flies outdoors higher than 20 meters, and can be localized using GPS [7]- [9]. To the best of our knowledge, the work in [1] is the first to demonstrate how a MAV could assist a ground robot in close collaboration in mapping a damaged building indoors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%