Large-scale monitoring of effects of clothianidin dressed oilseed rape seeds on pollinating insects in Northern Germany: implementation of the monitoring project and its representativeness

Abstract

Monitoring studies at the landscape level are complex, expensive and difficult to conduct. Many aspects have to be considered to avoid confounding effects which is probably the reason why they are not regularly performed in the context of risk assessments of plant protection products to pollinating insects. However, if conducted appropriately their contribution is most valuable. In this paper we identify the requirements of a large-scale monitoring study for the assessment of side-effects of clothianidin seed-treated winter oilseed rape on three species of pollinating insects (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis) and present how these requirements were implemented. Two circular study sites were delineated next to each other in northeast Germany and comprised almost 65 km2 each. At the reference site, study fields were drilled with clothianidin-free OSR seeds while at the test site the oilseed rape seeds contained a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds (Elado®). The comparison of environmental conditions at the study sites indicated that they are as similar as possible in terms of climate, soil, land use, history and current practice of agriculture as well as in availability of oilseed rape and non-crop bee forage. Accordingly, local environmental conditions were considered not to have had any confounding effect on the results of the monitoring of the bee species. Furthermore, the study area was found to be representative for other oilseed rape cultivation regions in Europe.

The Impact of Pesticides on Flower‐Visiting Insects: A Review with Regard to European Risk Assessment

“…Agricultural soils are therefore often contaminated with multiple pesticides (Hvě zdová et al 2018). Measurable neonicotinoid residues in various crop soils range from 10 −1 to 10 1 ng/g (Jones et al 2014;Botías et al 2015;Heimbach et al 2016;Wood and Goulson 2017). To assess pesticide exposure, it is important to know not only the (peak) concentrations but also the persistence in the soil matrix.…”

An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 2: impacts on organisms and ecosystems

“…An example of the requirements of large field studies and their implementation is given by Heimbach et al ( 2016 ). A wider review of neonicotinoid field studies by the industry can be found in Schmuck and Lewis ( 2016 ).…”

Effects of winter and spring rape seed treatment with neonicotinoids on honey bees

“…The study investigated the amount of pesticide residues in the nectar and honey, the composition of pollen collected by bees, the potential adverse effects on bumble bees and bees, the strength and development of colonies, and honey production. The findings revealed no adverse effects on these insects (Heimbach et al, 2016;Rolke et al, 2016;Schmuck, Lewis, 2016;Sterk et al, 2016). A similar study conducted in Estonia in 2013-2014 by Karise et al (2017) found that the concentration of all pesticide residues was lower than the lethal dose for honey bees.…”