The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3099082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale magnetic topologies of cool stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latest implementation (Donati 2001;Donati et al 2006c), the magnetic field is decomposed in its poloidal and toroidal components, both expressed as spherical harmonics expansions; this newer method is found to be not only much more robust (especially for low-order large-scale fields like dipoles) and more physical (for the field description), but also more convenient (e.g., allowing to fine tune the respective weight of spatial scales) and informative (poloidal and toroidal field components are key ingredients in most theoretical studies on magnetic stars, Mestel 1999). While most efficient for rapidly rotating stars, this method is also applicable to slow rotators, though limited to low-order spherical harmonic modes (e.g., Donati et al 2006cDonati et al , 2008b. Note that magnetic mapping is practical both for stars with no intrinsic field variations and for stars with variable fields, provided that the typical timescale on which the field evolves is long compared to the rotation period.…”
Section: Parametric Modelling and Tomographic Imaging Of Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the latest implementation (Donati 2001;Donati et al 2006c), the magnetic field is decomposed in its poloidal and toroidal components, both expressed as spherical harmonics expansions; this newer method is found to be not only much more robust (especially for low-order large-scale fields like dipoles) and more physical (for the field description), but also more convenient (e.g., allowing to fine tune the respective weight of spatial scales) and informative (poloidal and toroidal field components are key ingredients in most theoretical studies on magnetic stars, Mestel 1999). While most efficient for rapidly rotating stars, this method is also applicable to slow rotators, though limited to low-order spherical harmonic modes (e.g., Donati et al 2006cDonati et al , 2008b. Note that magnetic mapping is practical both for stars with no intrinsic field variations and for stars with variable fields, provided that the typical timescale on which the field evolves is long compared to the rotation period.…”
Section: Parametric Modelling and Tomographic Imaging Of Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worthwhile noting that X-ray luminosities of M dwarfs (relative to their bolometric luminosities) are roughly equal (at similar Ro) on both sides of the full-convection threshold, while the strengths of their large-scale fields feature a clear discontinuity (at a mass of about 0.4 M ⊙ , Donati et al 2008c). All this suggests that dynamo processes become much more efficient at producing large-scale mainly-axisymmetric poloidal fields essentially as a response to the rapid growth in convective depths with decreasing stellar masses; this is qualitatively compatible with the idea that the geometry of the CZ may control the kind of dynamo wave that a cosmic body can excite (Goudard & Dormy 2008).…”
Section: Benchmarking Dynamo Models With Observations Of Cool Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations