2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale magmatic–hydrothermal system of Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan, revealed by broadband magnetotellurics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10a shows the estimated source locations of the tilt onset, VLP signals, tensile opening (Terada et al., 2021), and volcanic tremor (Yamada et al., 2021). Except for volcanic tremor, all source locations are aligned from the low‐resistivity region (Matsunaga et al., 2022; Nurhasan et al., 2006; Tseng et al., 2020) toward the Motoshirane summit. We interpret the results representing the hydrothermal intrusion path that triggered the 2018 eruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 10a shows the estimated source locations of the tilt onset, VLP signals, tensile opening (Terada et al., 2021), and volcanic tremor (Yamada et al., 2021). Except for volcanic tremor, all source locations are aligned from the low‐resistivity region (Matsunaga et al., 2022; Nurhasan et al., 2006; Tseng et al., 2020) toward the Motoshirane summit. We interpret the results representing the hydrothermal intrusion path that triggered the 2018 eruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kusatsu‐Shirane volcano in Japan has a persistent volcanic hydrothermal system (e.g., Matsunaga et al., 2022; Nurhasan et al., 2006; Ohba et al., 1994; Terada & Hashimoto, 2017). Apart from a phreatic eruption on 23 January 2018, all documented eruptions (since 1882) and most unrest activities have occurred at the Shirane cone (Figure 1), which hosts a crater lake of Yugama and several active fumaroles and springs at the flank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the MT method uses naturally generated EM fields as a source, eliminating the reliance on a transmitter, generally increasing the depth of investigation, and simplifying logistics in the field. MT has been used for remote detection and imaging of volumes of partially molten magma beneath volcanic systems for many years (e.g., Aizawa et al., 2014; Comeau et al., 2016; Hill et al., 2009; Ingham et al., 2009; Matsunaga, Kanda, Koyama, et al., 2020; Matsunaga, Kanda, Takakura, et al., 2020; Mogi & Nakamura, 1993; Ogawa et al., 2014; Park & Torres‐Verdin, 1988; Tseng et al., 2020; Wannamaker et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2021; Ye et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%