2004
DOI: 10.1101/gr.1475304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale Integration of Human Genetic and Physical Maps

Abstract: Genetic maps are used routinely in family-based linkage studies to identify the rough location of genes that influence human traits and diseases. Unlike physical maps, genetic maps are based on the amount of recombination occurring between adjacent loci rather than the actual number of bases separating them. Genetic maps are constructed by statistically characterizing the number of crossovers observed in parental meioses leading to the transmission of alleles to their offspring. Considerations such as the numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first was an inversion of a 12 cM region on chromosome 8 in the genetic marker map, which has since been published, 17 and 1 marker, D5S1359, which led to a change in the maximum multipoint LOD score on chromosome 5 (LODϭ2.12 with D5S1359 included; LODϭ2.50 with D5S1359 excluded). This marker is not in the Rutger's map, and had been selected according to position at Southampton (http://cedar.genetics.soton.ac.uk/public_html/LDB2000/ release.html), which we have not been able to further validate.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Marker Maps On Lod Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first was an inversion of a 12 cM region on chromosome 8 in the genetic marker map, which has since been published, 17 and 1 marker, D5S1359, which led to a change in the maximum multipoint LOD score on chromosome 5 (LODϭ2.12 with D5S1359 included; LODϭ2.50 with D5S1359 excluded). This marker is not in the Rutger's map, and had been selected according to position at Southampton (http://cedar.genetics.soton.ac.uk/public_html/LDB2000/ release.html), which we have not been able to further validate.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Marker Maps On Lod Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user provides intermarker recombination fractions or genetic map distances obtained from genetic maps [1,3] or through interpolation. If no genetic map is available for the markers of interest, SNP marker loci can be ordered based upon their sequence-based physical map position and then interpolated onto a genetic map -for example, the Rutgers Combined Linkage-Physical Map [3] or the DeCode genetic map [13,15] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic maps, however, are not known with certainty. Comparison studies of sequence-based physical maps and genetic maps have revealed discrepancies in the order of some markers (Matise et al 2002;Nievergelt et al 2004). Differences in marker order and marker location between published genetic maps have also been found (Nievergelt et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comparison studies of sequence-based physical maps and genetic maps have revealed discrepancies in the order of some markers (Matise et al 2002;Nievergelt et al 2004). Differences in marker order and marker location between published genetic maps have also been found (Nievergelt et al 2004). These inaccuracies can seriously bias linkage findings from genetic epidemiologic studies (Buetow 1991;Halpern and Whittemore 1999;Daw et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%