2016
DOI: 10.1093/database/baw155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale inference of gene function through phylogenetic annotation of Gene Ontology terms: case study of the apoptosis and autophagy cellular processes

Abstract: We previously reported a paradigm for large-scale phylogenomic analysis of gene families that takes advantage of the large corpus of experimentally supported Gene Ontology (GO) annotations. This ‘GO Phylogenetic Annotation’ approach integrates GO annotations from evolutionarily related genes across ∼100 different organisms in the context of a gene family tree, in which curators build an explicit model of the evolution of gene functions. GO Phylogenetic Annotation models the gain and loss of functions in a gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioinformatics analysis. Classification of identified PIAS1 substrates was performed using PANTHER (Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships) (http://www.pantherdb.org), which classifies genes and proteins by their functions 58,59 . The identified PIAS1 substrates were grouped into the biological process, molecular function, and cellular component classes against the background of quantified SUMOylome using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinformatics analysis. Classification of identified PIAS1 substrates was performed using PANTHER (Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships) (http://www.pantherdb.org), which classifies genes and proteins by their functions 58,59 . The identified PIAS1 substrates were grouped into the biological process, molecular function, and cellular component classes against the background of quantified SUMOylome using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 60 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroautophagy occurs through the formation of a specific organelle called the autophagosome [ 9 ] (GO:0005776, Figure 2 ). The steps of the autophagosome assembly, as well as the different cellular components involved, have been described in Feuermann et al [ 32 ]. We have improved the definitions of autophagy-related terms by adding appropriate relationships between some processes and the relevant cellular component terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the function of S. cerevisiae Atg2 (UniProt identifier: P53855) has been extensively studied, but experimental data are rather poor for the corresponding human homologs ATG2A and ATG2B (Q2TAZ0 and Q96BY7). Propagation of annotations from yeast to human via the Phylogenetic Annotation and INference Tool (PAINT) pipeline developed by the GOC [ 32 , 42 , 43 ] enabled the association of ‘autophagosome assembly’ (GO:0000045) and ‘autophagy of mitochondrion’ (GO:0000422) with the 2 human homologs (see Materials and Methods for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification schemes for BLs are of utmost importance due to the diversity of these enzymes and their importance in the scenario of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. 1 , 4 , 5 , 16 In general, the identification of new sequences is most often done by sequence comparison methods, 48 such as the BLASTP program. 34 Profiles HMM and other profile-sequence comparison methods led to a significant improvement in sensitivity over sequence comparison approaches and are already used in the identification of antibiotic resistance proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%