2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 serological screening among healthcare workers with a low infection prevalence based on nasopharyngeal swab tests in an Italian university hospital: Perspectives for public health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These latter groups of workers significantly contributed to the overall numbers of COVID-19 cases, in particular during the first wave of the pandemic, with a prevalence of infection estimated at 12% [14]. As a result, the serological antibody positivity rate is expected to be high; recent Italian data collected in the same period as our study showed a 90-day IgM positivity rate of 11.5% and 2.4% for IgG positivity [15]. In our sample of non-healthcare workers, we found that 50% tested positive for IgM (alone or together with IgG); this may indicate that half of these workers had a relatively recent SARS-CoV-2 infection [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These latter groups of workers significantly contributed to the overall numbers of COVID-19 cases, in particular during the first wave of the pandemic, with a prevalence of infection estimated at 12% [14]. As a result, the serological antibody positivity rate is expected to be high; recent Italian data collected in the same period as our study showed a 90-day IgM positivity rate of 11.5% and 2.4% for IgG positivity [15]. In our sample of non-healthcare workers, we found that 50% tested positive for IgM (alone or together with IgG); this may indicate that half of these workers had a relatively recent SARS-CoV-2 infection [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the other hand, other Italian studies conducted among HCW showed similar results [6,14], and in particular Vimercati et al found no associations between the diagnosis through swabs with increasing age, and nor with gender. While considering the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM seroprevalence, they found a significantly lower mean age of the subjects with antibody positivity compared to the negative group [14]. In any case, when interpreting these Italian data obtained in HCW it should be considered that the large majority of the samples are composed by females, and in particular in our study, women were 71% of the whole population, and moreover about 90% of the operators were aged less than 60 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This is partially in contrast with the recognized role of male gender and age as risk factors for symptomatic and severe COVID-19 [8]. On the other hand, other Italian studies conducted among HCW showed similar results [6,14], and in particular Vimercati et al found no associations between the diagnosis through swabs with increasing age, and nor with gender. While considering the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM seroprevalence, they found a significantly lower mean age of the subjects with antibody positivity compared to the negative group [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A limitation of this study is that the population is composed exclusively of HCWs subjected to a high clinical-instrumental screening and serological and molecular swab testing [ 32 ]. Another limitation is the lack of data on waist circumference, lean body mass and fat mass of HCWs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%