2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14043.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale galactic turbulence: can self-gravity drive the observed H i velocity dispersions?

Abstract: Observations of turbulent velocity dispersions in the HI component of galactic discs show a characteristic floor in galaxies with low star formation rates and within individual galaxies the dispersion profiles decline with radius. We carry out several high resolution adaptive mesh simulations of gaseous discs embedded within dark matter haloes to explore the roles of cooling, star-formation, feedback, shearing motions and baryon fraction in driving turbulent motions. In all simulations the disc slowly cools un… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
183
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
183
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulence may be driven by the energy injection from young stars at high SF intensities (e.g. Agertz et al 2009). …”
Section: Exponents In the Generalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turbulence may be driven by the energy injection from young stars at high SF intensities (e.g. Agertz et al 2009). …”
Section: Exponents In the Generalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale turbulence probably plays a role in this. The cause of the Hi velocity dispersions is complicated and not well-understood, but turbulence driven by star formation, supernovae, shearing motions and magnetic instabilities all may play a role (Tamburro et al 2009;Agertz et al 2009). …”
Section: Hi Velocity Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model the gravitational interaction between the gas and the potential of the arms would be responsible for sheared motions that further evolve into turbulence. The main difference between both is that the gravitational collapse drives motions at small scales (∼ λJeans), with subsonic/transonic motions (Agertz et al 2009), while the gas-arm interaction drives supersonic turbulence at large scales. Also, the gravitational collapse drives coherent inward motions that may develop into chaotic motions after the complex interaction between collapsed structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a scenario multiple and discontinous arms are formedand destroyed -in relatively short timescales. Also, dense and cold regions would form, scarcely distributed in the disk, as a consequence of the gravitational collapse of a cooling ISM (Agertz et al 2009). The relative motion between the clouds and the arms would be reduced compared to the standing shock wave model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%