2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale forcing effects on wind flows in the urban canopy: Impact of inflow conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(81 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the remarkable accuracy of results suggests that close to high-rise buildings the flow is only influenced by the building and its features, meaning that turbulence at the inflow only has a marginal effect on the assessment of the flow field where of interest. Recent works seems to agree that the flow field across the domain might be divided into a far-from-buildings region showing a strong sensitivity to the inlet profile, and a through-buildings region where the behavior seems rather insensitive [22]. As an increasing number of LES studies on simplified geometries investigate the possibility of introducing a suitable turbulent inlet to correct for the spatial limitedness of the computational domain [23], it is not clear how an inlet profile matching mean wind speed and turbulence intensity might guarantee on the description of the fluctuating flow behavior over a complex urban setup [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the remarkable accuracy of results suggests that close to high-rise buildings the flow is only influenced by the building and its features, meaning that turbulence at the inflow only has a marginal effect on the assessment of the flow field where of interest. Recent works seems to agree that the flow field across the domain might be divided into a far-from-buildings region showing a strong sensitivity to the inlet profile, and a through-buildings region where the behavior seems rather insensitive [22]. As an increasing number of LES studies on simplified geometries investigate the possibility of introducing a suitable turbulent inlet to correct for the spatial limitedness of the computational domain [23], it is not clear how an inlet profile matching mean wind speed and turbulence intensity might guarantee on the description of the fluctuating flow behavior over a complex urban setup [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such change of surface roughness regulates or even restructures local meteorological conditions, i.e., cumulative urban heat from wildness to urban areas. Quite some work in this direction has been carried out by Ricci et al [4][5][6] CFD simulations and full-scale measurements. The authors have confirmed and proven how the surface roughness, the large-scale forcing (inflow conditions) and local scale forcing (e.g., buildings) can strongly affect the wind effects inside an urban environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These wind profiles are assumed to be uniform in the span-wise direction, for a measured reference wind direction (as in the present case for α = 240°), at the inlet face of the computational domain. This assumption was investigated by Ricci et al (2018) where CFD simulations on the same reduced-scale urban model (i.e. Quartiere La Venezia) were performed taking into account span-wise gradients in the ABL profiles measured in the WT upstream of the urban model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quartiere La Venezia) were performed taking into account span-wise gradients in the ABL profiles measured in the WT upstream of the urban model. The results of Ricci et al (2018) showed that using profiles with span-wise gradients as well as slightly different formulations to define the inlet turbulent kinetic energy (k) and turbulence dissipation rate (ε) profiles lead to comparable numerical results within the UCL. This means that at the building scale there is no need to use more accurate boundary conditions because they are as effective as the simpler ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%