1999
DOI: 10.1042/bj3440297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale expression and purification of the human vitamin D receptor and its ligand-binding domain for structural studies

Abstract: We have expressed recombinant human vitamin D receptor and its ligand-binding domain in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) insect cells with a 30-litre bioreactor. Both proteins were purified to apparent homogeneity with yields of 0.5-3.5 mg\l. Gel-filtration analyses indicated that the purified human vitamin D receptor and its ligand-binding domain were present as monomers in solution. The purified vitamin D receptor and its ligand-binding domain were demonstrated to bind 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D $ with high affinit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously reported the dissociation constants K d of vitamin D for the VDRwt ( K d = 0.55 n m ) and VDRmt ( K d = 0.37 n m ) [13] and have shown that there is no significant difference between values for the two proteins. These values agreed well with those previously obtained for recombinant VDR from E. coli , yeast and insect cells [25–31]. To compare the relative binding affinities for VDRmt of 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 and several 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 agonists analogs, MC903, EB1089 and the 20‐epi KH1060 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously reported the dissociation constants K d of vitamin D for the VDRwt ( K d = 0.55 n m ) and VDRmt ( K d = 0.37 n m ) [13] and have shown that there is no significant difference between values for the two proteins. These values agreed well with those previously obtained for recombinant VDR from E. coli , yeast and insect cells [25–31]. To compare the relative binding affinities for VDRmt of 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 and several 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 agonists analogs, MC903, EB1089 and the 20‐epi KH1060 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In previous reports on the expression and purification of E. coli VDR, the protein was solubilized by renaturation of inclusion bodies [25,26] or by expression of the VDR LBD fused to the glutathione S ‐transferase [27] or the maltose binding protein [28]. Lower amounts of the protein has also been purified from yeast [29] or insect cells using baculovirus [30,31]. The insertion region is not well ordered according to secondary structure prediction and presents only few short β strands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other full-length nuclear receptors, for example the GR, have been puri®ed to homogeneity via column chromatography [Warren et al, 1996]. Another group [Juntunen et al, 1999] recently puri®ed baculovirus expressed hVDR to homogeneity in preparation for crystallization, and hVDR also has been isolated using amylose resin af®nity puri®ca-tion of an E. coli-overexpressed hVDR-maltose binding protein fusion construct [Mottershead et al, 1996]. To probe speci®c hVDR±DNA interactions in the current study, puri®ed BEVS overexpressed receptor was utilized in electrophoretic mobility shift assays to evaluate the binding of hVDR, both alone and in conjunction with nuclear extracts, to the rat osteocalcin VDRE, an imperfect DR3 element with the sequence GGGTGAatgAGGACA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full length WT His-hVDR and WT Flag-hRXRα were expressed in Baculovirus system and purified by Ni-NTA/SEC or Flag/SEC, respectively, as described previously. [41]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%