2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fishers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
116
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…turtle excluding devices, weak links for nets and acoustic alarms) are already available for some of them (e.g. Barlow and Cameron 2003;Gilman et al 2006;Ward et al 2008). However, many of these methods are costly, and so there is a clear need and an opportunity to develop minimum-cost methods that are feasible for implementation in small-scale fisheries in the SWIO and globally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…turtle excluding devices, weak links for nets and acoustic alarms) are already available for some of them (e.g. Barlow and Cameron 2003;Gilman et al 2006;Ward et al 2008). However, many of these methods are costly, and so there is a clear need and an opportunity to develop minimum-cost methods that are feasible for implementation in small-scale fisheries in the SWIO and globally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduced longline soak time may also reduce the catch rate of sharks (Ward et al 2004, Erickson & Berkeley 2008, although if it also reduced the catch rate of billfish, there may be no net gain. The use of nylon leaders (as opposed to wire leaders) has been reported to reduce shark bycatch mortality (Ward et al 2008), but only under the assumption that sharks that bite off the hooks subsequently survive. In the case of swallowed hooks, that assumption is questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the north-west Pacific and Australia there were negligible differences between blue shark captures with circle and tuna hooks (Yokota et al, 2006;Ward et al, 2009), and in Hawaii there was a significant 36% decrease in shark captures between pre-and postregulations (Gilman et al, 2006). While sharks are considered bycatch and their capture undesirable in several fisheries around the world (Gilman et al, 2008;Ward et al, 2008), they are target species and frequently comprise the bulk of captures in the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery (Hazin et al, 2008). Thus, increase in captures reported in this study is a welcome result for the fishing companies and is beneficial for sea turtles by increasing the probability of the acceptance of circle hooks by the fishing industry.…”
Section: Bony Fish and Shark Target Capture Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%