2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large‐scale changes in abundance of terricolous bryophytes and macrolichens in Finland

Abstract: Abstract. Major changes in forest floor vegetation were identified on the basis of three nationwide surveys conducted as part of national forest inventories in 1951–1953, 1985–1986 and 1995. These surveys provided objectively selected, statistically representative samples of all forested land in Finland. The 1951–1953 data consist of over 10000 sample plots, while the later surveys were conducted on ca. 3000 permanent plots. Changes in relative abundance of dominant species (i.e. in the proportions of species… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional classification of boreal herb-rich forests is mainly based on vascular flora ( Kaakinen 1974, Alanen et al 1996, Kuusipalo 1996 but other groups, such as bryophytes, may also be useful in the classifications (La Roi and Stringer 1976). Terricolous bryophytes are regarded as good indicators of site quality (Ulvinen et al 2002) and environmental changes (Vellak et al 2003, Mäkipää andHeikkinen 2003). Bryophytes, however, indicate other environmental factors than vascular plants (Carleton 1990, Ulvinen et al 2002, Ingerpuu et al 2003, and they are important for distinguishing boreal herb-rich forests from herb-rich spruce mires (Kuusipalo 1985, 1996, Eurola et al 1984, Laine and Vasander 1998.…”
Section: Classification Of Herb-rich Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional classification of boreal herb-rich forests is mainly based on vascular flora ( Kaakinen 1974, Alanen et al 1996, Kuusipalo 1996 but other groups, such as bryophytes, may also be useful in the classifications (La Roi and Stringer 1976). Terricolous bryophytes are regarded as good indicators of site quality (Ulvinen et al 2002) and environmental changes (Vellak et al 2003, Mäkipää andHeikkinen 2003). Bryophytes, however, indicate other environmental factors than vascular plants (Carleton 1990, Ulvinen et al 2002, Ingerpuu et al 2003, and they are important for distinguishing boreal herb-rich forests from herb-rich spruce mires (Kuusipalo 1985, 1996, Eurola et al 1984, Laine and Vasander 1998.…”
Section: Classification Of Herb-rich Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter was estimated with cover-to-biomass models and with turnover rates. The litter input of the ground vegetation groups such as shrubs, herbs and grasses, lichens, and mosses of both southern and northern Finland were estimated with data from 3000 permanent sample plots, described in more detail by Mäkipää and Heikkinen (2003). Biomass models ) and the litter turnover rates from Liski et al (2006) were used to estimate litter (see Appendix A, Table A5).…”
Section: Litter Input From Understorey Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic network of 3000 permanent sample plots was established by the Finnish National Forest Inventory for the monitoring of forest ecosystems (Mäkipää and Heikkinen, 2003), and the first soil sampling on mineral soil sites was performed on a sub-sample of 486 plots from the nation-wide network during 1986-1989(Tamminen and Starr, 1990. In 2005, soil sampling was repeated on a subsample of n = 38 plots where the stand age varied between 22 and 65 years at the time of the first sampling.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Carbon Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%