Abstract:Abstract. There is little consensus on whether having a large root system is the best strategy in adapting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to water-limited environments. We explore the reasons for the lack of consensus and aim to answer the question of whether a large root system is useful in adapting wheat to dry environments. We used unpublished data from glasshouse and field experiments examining the relationship between root system size and their functional implication for water capture. Individual root trait… Show more
“…Recent work examining Arabidopsis thaliana showed that shoot and root growth are indeed under the same genetic control (Bouteillé et al 2012; and references therein). These results suggest that any advantages conferred by bigger root systems in terms of additional water extraction might be offset by the presence of a larger shoot consuming the extra water (Palta et al 2011). Two recent modelling studies showed exactly that: faster root growth generally led to faster soil water depletion, which subsequently led to yield penalties in soybean ) and chickpea .…”
Section: Are Root and Shoot Growth Under Common Or Independent Genetimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This raises the question as to whether root and shoot growth are under independent or coordinated genetic controls. Root and shoot growth is indeed closely coordinated (Jackson 1993;Palta et al 2011), and abscisic acid (ABA) likely plays a major role in that regulation (Munns and Cramer 1996). It is, in fact, critical for plants to maintain a hydraulic integrity in the soil-root-xylem-leaf-atmosphere continuum to maintain water fluxes (Kudoyarova et al 2013).…”
Section: Are Root and Shoot Growth Under Common Or Independent Genetimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a simulation study indicated that maize yields would increase if the root depth increased (Sinclair and Muchow 2001). Hammer et al (2009) postulated that changes in root architecture contributed to maize yield increases in the USA These examples illustrate that roots may not be the answer to all water stress scenarios and that their contribution to yield increases in water-limited environments depends on the crop and the stress conditions (Palta et al 2011). In summary, although there is no doubt that roots are important, their role in adapting to water stress might have been overstated.…”
Section: Usual Assumptions About Roots Under Water-limited Conditionsmentioning
Abstract. Water deficit is the main yield-limiting factor across the Asian and African semiarid tropics and a basic consideration when developing crop cultivars for water-limited conditions is to ensure that crop water demand matches season water supply. Conventional breeding has contributed to the development of varieties that are better adapted to water stress, such as early maturing cultivars that match water supply and demand and then escape terminal water stress. However, an optimisation of this match is possible. Also, further progress in breeding varieties that cope with water stress is hampered by the typically large genotype  environment interactions in most field studies. Therefore, a more comprehensive approach is required to revitalise the development of materials that are adapted to water stress. In the past two decades, transgenic and candidate gene approaches have been proposed for improving crop productivity under water stress, but have had limited real success. The major drawback of these approaches has been their failure to consider realistic water limitations and their link to yield when designing biotechnological experiments. Although the genes are many, the plant traits contributing to crop adaptation to water limitation are few and revolve around the critical need to match water supply and demand. We focus here on the genetic aspects of this, although we acknowledge that crop management options also have a role to play. These traits are related in part to increased, better or more conservative uses of soil water. However, the traits themselves are highly dynamic during crop development: they interact with each other and with the environment. Hence, success in breeding cultivars that are more resilient under water stress requires an understanding of plant traits affecting yield under water deficit as well as an understanding of their mutual and environmental interactions. Given that the phenotypic evaluation of germplasm/breeding material is limited by the number of locations and years of testing, crop simulation modelling then becomes a powerful tool for navigating the complexity of biological systems, for predicting the effects on yield and for determining the probability of success of specific traits or trait combinations across water stress scenarios.
“…Recent work examining Arabidopsis thaliana showed that shoot and root growth are indeed under the same genetic control (Bouteillé et al 2012; and references therein). These results suggest that any advantages conferred by bigger root systems in terms of additional water extraction might be offset by the presence of a larger shoot consuming the extra water (Palta et al 2011). Two recent modelling studies showed exactly that: faster root growth generally led to faster soil water depletion, which subsequently led to yield penalties in soybean ) and chickpea .…”
Section: Are Root and Shoot Growth Under Common Or Independent Genetimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This raises the question as to whether root and shoot growth are under independent or coordinated genetic controls. Root and shoot growth is indeed closely coordinated (Jackson 1993;Palta et al 2011), and abscisic acid (ABA) likely plays a major role in that regulation (Munns and Cramer 1996). It is, in fact, critical for plants to maintain a hydraulic integrity in the soil-root-xylem-leaf-atmosphere continuum to maintain water fluxes (Kudoyarova et al 2013).…”
Section: Are Root and Shoot Growth Under Common Or Independent Genetimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a simulation study indicated that maize yields would increase if the root depth increased (Sinclair and Muchow 2001). Hammer et al (2009) postulated that changes in root architecture contributed to maize yield increases in the USA These examples illustrate that roots may not be the answer to all water stress scenarios and that their contribution to yield increases in water-limited environments depends on the crop and the stress conditions (Palta et al 2011). In summary, although there is no doubt that roots are important, their role in adapting to water stress might have been overstated.…”
Section: Usual Assumptions About Roots Under Water-limited Conditionsmentioning
Abstract. Water deficit is the main yield-limiting factor across the Asian and African semiarid tropics and a basic consideration when developing crop cultivars for water-limited conditions is to ensure that crop water demand matches season water supply. Conventional breeding has contributed to the development of varieties that are better adapted to water stress, such as early maturing cultivars that match water supply and demand and then escape terminal water stress. However, an optimisation of this match is possible. Also, further progress in breeding varieties that cope with water stress is hampered by the typically large genotype  environment interactions in most field studies. Therefore, a more comprehensive approach is required to revitalise the development of materials that are adapted to water stress. In the past two decades, transgenic and candidate gene approaches have been proposed for improving crop productivity under water stress, but have had limited real success. The major drawback of these approaches has been their failure to consider realistic water limitations and their link to yield when designing biotechnological experiments. Although the genes are many, the plant traits contributing to crop adaptation to water limitation are few and revolve around the critical need to match water supply and demand. We focus here on the genetic aspects of this, although we acknowledge that crop management options also have a role to play. These traits are related in part to increased, better or more conservative uses of soil water. However, the traits themselves are highly dynamic during crop development: they interact with each other and with the environment. Hence, success in breeding cultivars that are more resilient under water stress requires an understanding of plant traits affecting yield under water deficit as well as an understanding of their mutual and environmental interactions. Given that the phenotypic evaluation of germplasm/breeding material is limited by the number of locations and years of testing, crop simulation modelling then becomes a powerful tool for navigating the complexity of biological systems, for predicting the effects on yield and for determining the probability of success of specific traits or trait combinations across water stress scenarios.
“…Increasing importance of subsoil moisture for crop performance implies an advantage of strongly explorative root systems (Kirkegaard et al 2007;Wasson et al 2012). Particularly spring sown cereals may profit from quick root depth penetration to avoid early drought, making better use of post-winter water resources in deeper soil layers (Palta et al 2011). Sustained growth during periods of early season water deficit furthermore enhances quick canopy coverage, thereby reducing soil evaporation and saving stored soil water for crop transpiration.…”
Section: Plant Resistance To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wheat, physiological and root research studies evidence the significant contribution of roots to higher drought resistance (e.g. Sanguineti et al 2007;Manschadi et al 2008;Palta et al 2011). Wasson et al (2012) give an overview of selection strategies for root improvement of wheat in Australia.…”
Section: Breeding For Dehydration Avoidancementioning
Drought is a predominant cause of low yields worldwide. There is an urgent need for more water efficient cropping systems facing large water consumption of irrigated agriculture and high unproductive losses via runoff and evaporation. Identification of yield-limiting constraints in the plant-soil-atmosphere continuum are the key to improved management of plant water stress. Crop ecology provides a systematic approach for this purpose integrating soil hydrology and plant physiology into the context of crop production. We review main climate, soil and plant properties and processes that determine yield in different water-limited environments. From this analysis, management measures for cropping systems under specific drought conditions are derived. Major findings from literature analysis are as follows. (1) Unproductive water losses such as evaporation and runoff increase from continental in-season rainfall climates to storage-dependent winter rainfall climates. Highest losses occur under tropical residual moisture regimes with short intense rainy season. (2) Sites with a climatic dry season require adaptation via phenology and water saving to ensure stable yields. Intermittent droughts can be buffered via the root system, which is still largely underutilised for better stress resistance. (3) At short-term better management options such as mulching and date of seeding allow to adjust cropping systems to site constraints. Adapted cultivars can improve the synchronisation between crop water demand and soil supply. At long term, soil hydraulic and plant physiological constraints can be overcome by changing tillage systems and breeding new varieties with higher stress resistance. (4) Interactions between plant and soil, particularly in the rhizosphere, are a way towards better crop water supply. Targeted management of such plant-soil interactions is still at infancy.We conclude that understanding site-specific stress hydrology is imperative to select the most efficient measures to mitigate stress. Major progress in future can be expected from crop ecology focussing on the management of complex plant (root)-soil interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.