1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.65.1949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Order Behavior of the Perturbation Series for Superconductors nearHc2

Abstract: The perturbation series for superconductors near H c i are studied in the two-and three-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau model. The large-order behavior is discussed first on a theoretical basis by an instanton method of Lipatov type. The results are compared with an eleventh-order calculation in 2D and a sixth-order one in 3D and show good agreement with the theoretical prediction. The conjectures based upon an Abrikosov lattice configuration seem to be ruled out.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One can compare the results with existing (not very extensive) Monte Carlo simulation and agreement is well within the MC precision. Moreover similar method was applied to the 2D GL model which was simulated extensively (Hu and MacDonald, 1993;Hu et al, 1994;Kato and Nagaosa, 1993;O'Neill and Moore, 1993;Tešanović and Xing, 1991) and for which longer series are available (Brézin et al, 1990;Hikami et al, 1991) and agreement is still perfect. We conclude that the method is precise enough to study the melting problem.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can compare the results with existing (not very extensive) Monte Carlo simulation and agreement is well within the MC precision. Moreover similar method was applied to the 2D GL model which was simulated extensively (Hu and MacDonald, 1993;Hu et al, 1994;Kato and Nagaosa, 1993;O'Neill and Moore, 1993;Tešanović and Xing, 1991) and for which longer series are available (Brézin et al, 1990;Hikami et al, 1991) and agreement is still perfect. We conclude that the method is precise enough to study the melting problem.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to use BP for calculation of melting also ran into problems. Hikami, Fujita and Larkin (Brézin et al, 1990;Hikami et al, 1991) tried to find the melting point by comparing the BP energy with the one loop solid energy and obtained a T = −7. However their one loop solid energy was incorrect (by factor √ 2) and in any case it was not precise enough, since the two loop contribution is essential.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fluctuations become more important with reduced dimensionality and there is the limiting magnetic length scale L H it becomes clear that the upper critical field H c2 is an artefact of the approximations. Indeed, calculations of the specific heat in a magnetic field which treat the interaction terms in the Hartree approximation and extensions thereof, find that the specific heat is smooth through the mean-field transition temperature T c2 (H) [7,8,9]. In the context of finite size scaling this is simply due to the fact that the correlation length of fluctuations which are transverse to the applied magnetic field are bounded by the magnetic length L H ∝ H −1/2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients can be found in ref. [24,25]. We will denote g k (x) by the [k, k − 1] BP transform of g(x) (other BP approximants clearly violate the correct low temperature asymptotics).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%