“…[1989] Discusses requests for predictive testing of affected individuals, minors, impact on relatives, use of research samples for clinical purposes Demyttenaere et al [1992] Discusses challenging counseling situations Harper and Newcombe [1992] Use of life table risk estimates in counseling; anticipates the report of Brinkman et al [1997] Heimler andZanko [1995], Reich et al [1996] Case report of testing monozygotic twins Mehlman et al [1996], Burgess et al [1997], Uhlmann et al [1996], Visintainer et al [2001] Anonymous testing Alford et al [1996] Challenging laboratory and clinical scenarios Almqvist et al [1997] Discusses the impact of the unusual situation of a reversal of risk between a linkage analysis and direct gene analysis Maat-Kievit et al [1999b], Benjamin and Lashwood [2000], Lindblad [2001] Testing individuals at 25% risk Alonso et al [2002], Squitieri et al [2003] Counseling about unexpected homozygosity for an expanded allele; predictive testing for patients at risk for homozygosity Nahhas et al [2009] Contraction of an abnormal allele into the reduced penetrance range Hendricks et al [2009] Estimating the probability of de novo HD in the children of male carriers of high-normal alleles Sequeiros et al [2010], Semaka et al [2013c] Frequency of intermediate and reduced penetrance alleles Chen et al [2012] Use of a novel model for estimating genetic risk incorporating family information Palomaki and Richards [2012] Laboratory proficiency testing Semaka et al [2013a] Patient comprehension of the implications of an intermediate allele Squitieri and Jankovic [2012], Ha et al [2012] Possibility of a phenotype associated with CAG repeat lengths of 27-35 Semaka et al [2013bSemaka et al [ , 2015, Semaka and Hayden (2014) CAG size-specific risk estimates for intermediate allele repeat instability; counseling implications; case report of expansion of a maternal intermediate allele Bean and Bayrak-Toydemir [20...…”