2011
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2011.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large intraslab earthquake (2011 April 7, M 7.1) after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (M 9.0): Coseismic fault model based on the dense GPS network data

Abstract: We propose a source fault model for the 2011, April 7, earthquake (M 7.1) deduced from a dense GPS network. The coseismic displacements obtained by GPS data analysis clearly show the spatial pattern specific to intraslab earthquakes, not only in the horizontal components but also the vertical ones. A rectangular fault with uniform slip was estimated by a non-linear inversion approach. The results indicate that the simple rectangular fault model can explain the overall features of the observations. The amount o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of aftershocks suggests that the rupture associated with this event did not propagate into the oceanic crust beyond the Moho. These conclusions are also supported by the fault plane solution of the M7.1 event inferred from geodetic data [ Ohta et al , 2011].…”
Section: Tomographic Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of aftershocks suggests that the rupture associated with this event did not propagate into the oceanic crust beyond the Moho. These conclusions are also supported by the fault plane solution of the M7.1 event inferred from geodetic data [ Ohta et al , 2011].…”
Section: Tomographic Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On 7 April, an earthquake (M7.1) occurred in the Pacific slab at a depth of 66 km, located near the down‐dip limit of the large interplate slip of the M9 event (Figure 1). GPS data indicate slips of 2.5 m during the M7.1 event and the source area of 30 km by 30 km [ Ohta et al , 2011]. The M7.1 event was probably triggered by stress change resulting from the large fault slip by the M9 event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can put the constraints of fault parameters as prior information. The estimated parameters occasionally depend on the initial values assumed in the recursive procedure [e.g., Ohta et al , 2012]. To estimate all the fault parameters (location, depth, length, width, strike, dip, rake, and slip amount), we assumed initial values based on the two rectangular fault models provided by the GSI (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, http://www.gsi.go.jp/cais/topic110422-index-e.html, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyze the ground shaking and earthquake source spectra for 11 large (M w 6.0-7.6) earthquakes from 2003 to 2011 (Table 1), including a large thrust event (M w 7.2, 7 April 2011) that occurred in the Pacific slab below the down-dip limit of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and an outer-rise normal-faulting event (M w 7.6, 11 March 2011) that occurred 40 min after the great 2011 event. Both events were probably triggered by stress changes resulting from the large fault slip in the great 2011 event Ohta et al, 2011). Nakajima et al (2011) suggest that the thrust event possibly involved reactivation of a preexisting hydrated fault with overpressurized fluids or serpentine minerals that had originally formed during bending near the trench.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%