2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2008.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large gains in the St. Petersburg game

George Stoica
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, for sufficiently large x ∈ R + , using (16), we see that Next, for sufficiently large x ∈ R + , using (16), we see that…”
Section: Lemma 2 For X (α) Defined Bymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, for sufficiently large x ∈ R + , using (16), we see that Next, for sufficiently large x ∈ R + , using (16), we see that…”
Section: Lemma 2 For X (α) Defined Bymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, referring to results in[10] and[16], we give results for a polynomial size and a geometric size deviation of S Section 5. Comparing Theorem 2 and Theorem 3(ii) for α = 1, we confirm that the Feller game and the St. Petersburg game have different properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to geometric size deviations, Stoica [14] provided a result for the classical St Petersburg game to the effect that, for any ε > 0 and b > 1,…”
Section: Polynomial and Geometric Size Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bound follows by copying the lower half of page 565 of [14], replacing b n by b n/α at appropriate places. We omit the details.…”
Section: Polynomial and Geometric Size Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8, p. 452]) for 0 < α ≤ 1. Finally, referring to results in[10] and[16], we give results for a polynomial size and a geometric size deviation of S…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%