2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-002-0056-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulations Using the Subgrid-Scale Estimation Model and Truncated Navier-Stokes Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a weak ultraviolet nonlocality has important implications for large eddy simulation ͑LES͒, limiting the range of unresolved scales that are dynamically relevant and must be modeled. [12][13][14] The observed disparity between the scaling and DNS based results could be due to the fact that DNS results are at too low Reynolds numbers or that the asymptotic 4/3 scaling is not applicable for the relatively modest value s = 2. The purpose of this work is to elucidate the reasons for the observed differences between numerical and theoretical results as well as to determine under what conditions a better agreement is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Such a weak ultraviolet nonlocality has important implications for large eddy simulation ͑LES͒, limiting the range of unresolved scales that are dynamically relevant and must be modeled. [12][13][14] The observed disparity between the scaling and DNS based results could be due to the fact that DNS results are at too low Reynolds numbers or that the asymptotic 4/3 scaling is not applicable for the relatively modest value s = 2. The purpose of this work is to elucidate the reasons for the observed differences between numerical and theoretical results as well as to determine under what conditions a better agreement is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It also lends weight to the applicability of the truncated Navier-Stokes approach beyond isotropic turbulence and channel flow previously tested. 41,43,44 Its better performance is attributed to the filtering operation only affecting the smallest resolved scales, whereas turbulent eddy viscosity models often have a dissipative effect on a wider range of scales. Excluding the drastic changes in the baseline no-model simulation (UDNS) results in going to the coarser mesh, LES results at 3% and 1% are consistent in their ability to predict C f , C p , and boundary layer thicknesses.…”
Section: B Performance Of Les At 1% Of Dns Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The truncated Navier-Stokes (TNS) approach follows the method developed by Domaradzki, Loh, and Yee (2002) in which periodic filtering is used as a substitute for a subgrid-scale model. 41 Periodic filtering is used to remove energy from the smallest resolved scales by the use of a low-pass approximate deconvolution method (ADM) filter.…”
Section: Truncated Navier-stokesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a more clear identification of this range the notion of resolved scales, i.e., scales where discrete operators used for approximation of the flow evolution equations are accurate, and of represented scales, i.e., scales with wavenumber less than the Nyquist wavenumber of the underlying grid, has been introduced. 5 A relaxation term was introduced as dissipative mechanism on this buffer range. Note that this condition is different from just requiring the truncation error to be small, as this range of scales for practically relevant LES always contains a significant fraction of total kinetic energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%