2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large eddy simulations of unsteady flows over a stationary airfoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large-eddy simulation (LES) was carried out using the finite volume software Fluent by solving the time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Here, the wall-adapting local eddyviscosity (WALE) scheme was employed to model the subgrid eddy viscosity (Qin et al 2018). The pressure-based coupled solver was selected, and the momentum equations were discretised using the bounded central differencing (BDC) scheme (Zhu and Rodi 1991).…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large-eddy simulation (LES) was carried out using the finite volume software Fluent by solving the time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Here, the wall-adapting local eddyviscosity (WALE) scheme was employed to model the subgrid eddy viscosity (Qin et al 2018). The pressure-based coupled solver was selected, and the momentum equations were discretised using the bounded central differencing (BDC) scheme (Zhu and Rodi 1991).…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an airfoil specifically designed for low Reynolds number applications, the Selig-Donovan 7003 (SD7003) [33,34] has been recently investigated at Re = 6 × 10 4 employing LES [35,36,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concluded that high T u values managed to reduce and even suppress the LSB, thereby enhancing aerodynamic performance. Freestream unsteadiness effects were also assessed by Qin et al [36], this time by exploring different inlet velocity oscillation amplitudes and frequencies, at the same α = 4 • . Flow separation was delayed and even suppressed during the acceleration phase, while the separation point progressed upstream towards the leading edge in the deceleration phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%