2019
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-eddy simulation study of unsteady wake dynamics and geometric sensitivity on a skewed bump

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, this separation point is not well predicted from the cases B1 and B2, whereas that from the cases B3 and B4 is similar to the LES result. In addition to the large separation bubble, the thin secondary separation bubble was also observed at the leeside of the bump in the previous LES study by Ching & Eaton (2019). These secondary separation bubbles are captured in Figure 11 in the range of 0.1 < x/H < 0.3 for cases B2-B4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here, this separation point is not well predicted from the cases B1 and B2, whereas that from the cases B3 and B4 is similar to the LES result. In addition to the large separation bubble, the thin secondary separation bubble was also observed at the leeside of the bump in the previous LES study by Ching & Eaton (2019). These secondary separation bubbles are captured in Figure 11 in the range of 0.1 < x/H < 0.3 for cases B2-B4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The bump angle in the present study is at θ = 10 • and the simulation results are compared with those of previous experimental and LES studies (Ching et al 2018a;Ching & Eaton 2019). The coordinate origin is located on the bottom wall under the center of the bump and the Reynolds number based on the bulk velocity (0.83 m/s), and the bump height is 16,000.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations