21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-eddy simulation of underexpanded round jets impinging on a flat plate 4 to 9 radii downstream from the nozzle

Abstract: Supersonic round jets have been computed by compressible Large Eddy Simulation (LES) using low-dispersion and low-dissipation schemes. The jets are underexpanded, and are characterized by a Nozzle Pressure Ratio of N P R = Pr/Pamb = 4.03, where Pr is the stagnation pressure and Pamb is the ambient pressure. They have a fully expanded Mach number of Mj = 1.56, an exit Mach number of Me = 1, and a Reynolds number of Rej = ujD/ν = 5 × 10 4 , where ue and D are the jet exit velocity and the nozzle diameter, respec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(67 reference statements)
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…resulting in variation of U c /U j from 0.7 at M j = 1 to 0.57 at M j = 1.56, where M j is the equivalent ideally expanded jet Mach number. A spatial dependence was also pointed out by Gojon, Bogey & Marsden (2015), who reported from a numerical simulation that the convective velocity increases with the downstream distance z from the nozzle. Equation (1.1) also requires that the shock cell length be constant, whereas it decreases with the axial distance from the nozzle exit z (Tam, Jackson & Seiner 1985;Tam et al 1986).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…resulting in variation of U c /U j from 0.7 at M j = 1 to 0.57 at M j = 1.56, where M j is the equivalent ideally expanded jet Mach number. A spatial dependence was also pointed out by Gojon, Bogey & Marsden (2015), who reported from a numerical simulation that the convective velocity increases with the downstream distance z from the nozzle. Equation (1.1) also requires that the shock cell length be constant, whereas it decreases with the axial distance from the nozzle exit z (Tam, Jackson & Seiner 1985;Tam et al 1986).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Further details on the simulation are provided in a previous paper. 16 The jet is underexpanded, and is characterized by a Nozzle Pressure Ratio of NPR = P r /P amb = 4.03, where P r is the stagnation pressure and P amb is the ambient pressure. The fully expanded Mach number is M j = 1.56, the exit Mach number M e = 1, and the Reynolds number is Re D = 5 × 10 4 .…”
Section: A Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both mechanisms, the main parts of the feedback loop are the shear layer instabilities propagating downstream and pressure waves propagating upstream. The shear layer instabilities form unstable spatially growing hydrodynamic waves, and have been observed in previous experimental and numerical studies of free and impinging under-expanded supersonic jets [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. There is a common belief that the acoustic waves scattered by the nozzle lip through the receptivity process internalise as shear layer Kelvin-Helmholtz-type instabilities and form these coherent structures [2,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In recent years, there has been considerable interest in data-driven techniques to reveal the characteristics of coherent structures, especially in jet flows [13][14][15][16][17][18]. In the recent series of large eddy simulation studies of ideally expanded and under-expanded supersonic slot and round impinging jets [5,8,19], the discrete Fourier transform of the near-field pressure has been used to obtain the frequencies of the acoustic tones. The predicted acoustic tones and mean flow fields were in a good agreement with the experimental and numerical study of Krothapalli [20] for the ideally expanded jets, and with the experimental results of Henderson et al [3,12] for the under-expanded supersonic impinging case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%