2002
DOI: 10.1256/003590002320373210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large‐eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land

Abstract: SUMMARYLarge-eddy simulations of the development of shallow cumulus convection over land are presented. Many characteristics of the cumulus layer previously found in simulations of quasi-steady convection over the sea are found to be reproduced in this more strongly forced, unsteady case. Furthermore, the results are shown to be encouragingly robust, with similar results obtained with eight independent models, and also across a range of numerical resolutions. The datasets produced are already being used in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
386
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(19 reference statements)
21
386
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial jumps from the mixed layer to the free troposphere for θ ( θ ) and q ( q) are 1 K and −3 × 10 −6 kg kg −1 , respectively. In accordance with Brown (2002), the tropospheric θ gradient is 3 × 10 −3 K m −1 up to 4 km and 6 × 10 −3 K m −1 above 4 km . The specific humidity gradient in the troposphere is −3 × 10 −6 m −1 until the specific humidity becomes zero.…”
Section: Design Of Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The initial jumps from the mixed layer to the free troposphere for θ ( θ ) and q ( q) are 1 K and −3 × 10 −6 kg kg −1 , respectively. In accordance with Brown (2002), the tropospheric θ gradient is 3 × 10 −3 K m −1 up to 4 km and 6 × 10 −3 K m −1 above 4 km . The specific humidity gradient in the troposphere is −3 × 10 −6 m −1 until the specific humidity becomes zero.…”
Section: Design Of Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[19] Finally, a third case of shallow (liquid only) continental cumulus [Brown et al, 2002] complements Figures 7 and 8 by providing a view of S o in individual clouds in a cloud field with approximately 15% cloud cover. Cloud bases are at about 1 km and maximum cloud tops at 3 km, cloud depths are highly variable.…”
Section: Parcel Ensemblementioning
confidence: 84%
“…In that case many LES studies showed that the cloud fraction varies strongly with height (e.g. Siebesma and Cuijpers, 1995;Stevens et al, 2001;Brown et al, 2002). The turbulent flux across the cloud interface can be well approximated by an eddy diffusivity approach (Asai and Kasahara, 1967;Kuo, 1962):…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differences between these two cases concern the cloud depth (∼ 1000 m for BOMEX and ∼ 1700 m for RICO) and the mass flux profiles (more variable in RICO). The third case is based on an idealization of observations made at the Southern Great Plains ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program) site on 21 June 1997 (Brown et al, 2002). The ARM case describes the development of daytime shallow cumulus convection over land.…”
Section: Validation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%