2016
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2016.1193496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulation of Premixed Combustion: Sensitivity to Subgrid Scale Velocity Modeling

Abstract: An algebraic reaction rate closure involving filtered scalar dissipation rate of reaction progress variable is studied. The filtered scalar dissipation rate closure requires a model for sub-grid scale velocity, u 0 Δ , which is estimated using four algebraic models and transported subgrid scale kinetic energy. A priori analyses using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data show that the filtered dissipation rate, and thus the reaction rate closure, has some sensitivity to the u 0 Δ model. The sensitivity of var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SGS kinetic energy k is obtained using [32], [31]. The SGS pressure-work term, Π, is neglected based on previous LES study [33].…”
Section: A Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SGS kinetic energy k is obtained using [32], [31]. The SGS pressure-work term, Π, is neglected based on previous LES study [33].…”
Section: A Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the range of conditions investigated here with relatively low sub-grid fluctuations, the above mixing method is relatively robust in premixed flames [29]. It is in principle possible to include a chemical time-scale in the micro-mixing [35,36], to improve predictions with large sub-grid fluctuations. However, this has not been attempted in the present work The method has been successfully applied to capture flame extinction [21], auto-ignition [12] as well as several swirl flames and gas-turbine configurations [22,30,38] among others.…”
Section: Eulerian Stochastic Fields Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1]. However, this leads to additional unclosed terms [13,25] and computational cost, and is thus often not the preferred choice in a LES. Models which directly estimate the SGS velocity have been developed in the past mainly for nonreacting flows, and their corresponding model constants were derived assuming homogeneity and isotropy of the flow.…”
Section: B Subgrid Scale Velocity Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%