1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.869749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large eddy simulation of a nonpremixed reacting jet: Application and assessment of subgrid-scale combustion models

Abstract: Results from large eddy simulations (LES) and direct numerical simulations (DNS) of a two-dimensional, spatially developing, compressible planar free jet undergoing an idealized, exothermic, chemical reaction of the type F+rOx→(1+r)P are presented in order to assess several subgrid-scale (SGS) combustion models. Both a priori and a posteriori assessments are conducted. The SGS turbulence model used is the dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM). Two classes of SGS combustion models are employed in this study. These in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subgrid-scale models The introduction of the dynamic model proposed by Germano et al (1991) has spurred significant progress in the subgrid-scale (SGS) modelling of non-equilibrium flows. Among the various SGS turbulence models, such as the mixed model (Fureby 1996) and the two-parameter mixed model (Salvetti & Banerjee 1995), the dynamic SGS model for turbulence closure offers the best trade-off between accuracy and cost (Desjardin & Frankel 1998). In the present study, the dynamic Smagorinsky model for compressible flows proposed by Moin et al (1991) is employed.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgrid-scale models The introduction of the dynamic model proposed by Germano et al (1991) has spurred significant progress in the subgrid-scale (SGS) modelling of non-equilibrium flows. Among the various SGS turbulence models, such as the mixed model (Fureby 1996) and the two-parameter mixed model (Salvetti & Banerjee 1995), the dynamic SGS model for turbulence closure offers the best trade-off between accuracy and cost (Desjardin & Frankel 1998). In the present study, the dynamic Smagorinsky model for compressible flows proposed by Moin et al (1991) is employed.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various SGS turbulence models, such as the mixed model [13] and the two-parameter mixed model [14], the dynamic SGS model for turbulence closure offers the best trade-off between accuracy and cost [15]. In the present study, the dynamic Smagorinsky model for compressible flows proposed by Moin et al [16] is employed.…”
Section: Subgrid-scale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of Pierce and Moin 4 has been extensively used over the years 7,20,36,37 as an alternate to the scale-similarity model suggested by Cook and Riley 2 based on the idea of Bardina et al 38 The scale-similarity model has been explored in several different configurations. 3,7,39,40 Recently, Balarac et al, 5 using the optimal estimator concept of Moreau et al, 25 showed that the irreducible error associated with a Smagorinsky-type model is relatively small if compared to that evaluated for a scalesimilarity model, meaning that the functional form of a gradient-based model has significant potential in LES for reproducing the SGS scalar variance. This has also been observed by Wall et al 36 when studying the performance of the two models used in that study in conjunction with a presumed PDF approach.…”
Section: B the Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%